QEEG Changes During Carotid Clamping in Carotid Endarterectomy: Spectral Edge Frequency Parameters and Relative Band Power Parameters
Autor: | R.J. Veldhuizen, George H. Wieneke, Alexander C. van Huffelen, Hans van Duijn, David M. Laman |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2005 |
Předmět: |
Male
Logarithm SURGERY Physiology medicine.medical_treatment HYPOXIA Carotid endarterectomy Electroencephalography CEREBRAL BLOOD-FLOW Carotid Stenosis EEG EEG CHANGES Propofol Endarterectomy Carotid Isoflurane HYPERVENTILATION medicine.diagnostic_test Constriction SEF ISCHEMIA Carotid Arteries Databases as Topic Neurology Anesthesia Anesthetics Inhalation Female TRIAL Spectral edge frequency carotid endarterectomy Anesthetics Intravenous Shunt (electrical) medicine.drug Sensitivity and Specificity STENOSIS quantitative QUANTITATIVE EEG Monitoring Intraoperative Physiology (medical) medicine Humans Electrodes Retrospective Studies Receiver operating characteristic business.industry Numerical Analysis Computer-Assisted shunt monitoring ROC Curve Neurology (clinical) business Biomedical engineering |
Zdroj: | Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 22(4), 244-252. LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS |
ISSN: | 0736-0258 |
DOI: | 10.1097/01.wnp.0000167931.83516.cf |
Popis: | Intraoperative monitoring is needed to identify accurately those patients in need of a shunt during carotid endarterectomy. EEG can be used for this purpose, but there is no consensus on the variables to use. Using a database consisting of 149 EEGs recorded from patients during carotid endarterectomy under isoflurane (n = 61) or propofol (n = 88) anesthesia and who did or did not receive a shunt, the authors investigated which of 16 derivations (common reference, Cz) and 12 parameters (relative and absolute powers and spectral edge frequencies [SEFs]) singly or in combination could best distinguish between the shunt and the nonshunt groups for the two anesthesia regimens. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to select derivation/parameter combinations for three types of trend computation: (1) values of relative powers and SEFs during clamping (C) only, (2) clamp minus preclamp (baseline) differences (C-B), and (3) C-B differences in absolute logarithmic power (Delta logP). For both anesthesia regimens, C-B computation distinguished best between the shunt and nonshunt groups. For isoflurane anesthesia, SEF parameters were the best, and for propofol anesthesia the relative power parameters. Discriminant analysis, in which additional derivation/parameter combinations were added, increased the discriminative power of the Delta logP computation but not of the C or C-B computations. For isoflurane anesthesia, SEF 90% was the best single parameter for distinguishing between patients who did and did not need a shunt and the four best derivations were F3-Cz, P4-Cz, C4-Cz, and F7-Cz. For the propofol anesthesia, the relative power (C or C-B computations) of the delta band was the best and the four best derivations were F8-Cz, T4-Cz, C4-Cz, and F4-Cz. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |