Neuroanatomy Learning: Augmented Reality vs. Cross-Sections
Autor: | Anne-Marie van Cappellen van Walsum, Jan G. M. Kooloos, Marianne M. van den Hurk, Guido de Jong, Marc A.T.M. Vorstenbosch, Loes van den Heuvel, Dylan J H A Henssen, Ronald H. M. A. Bartels |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
0301 basic medicine
Male Research Report Embryology 020205 medical informatics 02 engineering and technology neuroscience Cognition 0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering media_common neuroanatomy education Augmented Reality Anatomy Cross-Sectional Dissection Brain General Medicine Disorders of movement Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience [Radboudumc 3] Anatomy education Test (assessment) medicine.anatomical_structure Female Curriculum Anatomy Psychology Clinical psychology Histology Adolescent neuroanatomy media_common.quotation_subject education Learning and Plasticity Other Research Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience [Radboudumc 0] Healthcare improvement science Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 18] Education 03 medical and health sciences Young Adult Imaging Three-Dimensional Perception cross‐sectional anatomy medicine Humans Learning Students undergraduate education Other Research Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 0] Research Reports Focus group Reconstructive and regenerative medicine Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 10] Augmented reality 030101 anatomy & morphology Educational Measurement medical education Cognitive load Magnetic Resonance Angiography Neuroanatomy Program Evaluation |
Zdroj: | Anatomical Sciences Education Anatomical Sciences Education, 13, 353-365 Anatomical Sciences Education, 13, 3, pp. 353-365 |
ISSN: | 1935-9780 1935-9772 |
Popis: | Contains fulltext : 219124.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) Neuroanatomy education is a challenging field which could benefit from modern innovations, such as augmented reality (AR) applications. This study investigates the differences on test scores, cognitive load and motivation after neuroanatomy learning by using AR applications or by using cross-sections of the brain. Prior to two practical assignments, a pre-test (extended matching questions, double-choice questions and a test on cross-sectional anatomy) and a mental rotation test (MRT) were completed. Sex and MRT scores were used to stratify students over the two groups. The two practical assignments were designed to study (1) general brain anatomy and (2) subcortical structures. Subsequently, participants completed a post-test similar to the pre-test and a motivational questionnaire. Finally, a focus group interview was conducted to appraise participants' perceptions. Medical and biomedical students (n = 31); 19 males (61.3%) and 12 females (38.7%), mean age 19.2 ±1.7 years participated in this experiment. Students who worked with cross-sections (n = 16) showed significantly more improvement on test scores than students who worked with GreyMapp-AR (P = 0.035) (n = 15). Further analysis showed that this difference was primarily caused by significant improvement on the cross-sectional questions. Students in the cross-section group, moreover, experienced a significantly higher germane (P = 0.009) and extraneous cognitive load (P = 0.016) than students in the GreyMapp-AR group. No significant differences were found in motivational scores. To conclude, this study suggests that AR applications can play a role in future anatomy education as an add-on educational tool, especially in learning three-dimensional relations of anatomical structures. 13 p. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |