CAD-CAM milled versus pressed lithium-disilicate monolithic crowns adhesively cemented after distinct surface treatments: Fatigue performance and ceramic surface characteristics
| Autor: | Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira, Camila Pauleski Zucuni, Ataís Bacchi, Andressa Borin Venturini, Thiago A. L. Burgo, Ricardo Schestatsky, Luiz Felipe Valandro |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Ceramics
Materials science Surface Properties Biomedical Engineering Fractography 02 engineering and technology Surface finish Biomaterials 03 medical and health sciences chemistry.chemical_compound 0302 clinical medicine Etching (microfabrication) Materials Testing Dentin medicine Ceramic Composite material Pressing Crowns Weibull modulus Adhesiveness 030206 dentistry 021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology Dental Porcelain Silane medicine.anatomical_structure chemistry Mechanics of Materials visual_art visual_art.visual_art_medium Computer-Aided Design Stress Mechanical 0210 nano-technology |
| Zdroj: | Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 94:144-154 |
| ISSN: | 1751-6161 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.03.005 |
| Popis: | To evaluate the fatigue failure load (FFL), number of cycles for failure (CFF) and survival probabilities of lithium-disilicate (LD) monolithic crowns manufactured by two processing techniques (pressing vs. CAD/CAM) adhesively cemented to a dentin-analogue material, considering two surface treatments (conventional vs. simplified). Surface characteristics (topography, roughness and fractal dimensions) were also assessed. Forty (40) monolithic crowns were manufactured considering two specific processing techniques for each ceramic system: LDCAD – CAD/CAM lithium-disilicate (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent); LDPRESS – pressed lithium-disilicate (IPS e.max Press, Ivoclar Vivadent). The crowns were adhesively cemented (Multilink Automix System, Ivoclar Vivadent) onto dentin analogue preparations considering two distinct protocols of surface treatments (conventional – hydrofluoric acid etching + silane application [HF+Sil] or simplified – etching with one-step primer (Monobond Etch&Prime, Ivoclar Vivadent) [EP]). The cemented assembly was stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 3 days and fatigue tests were run (step-stress approach: load ranging from 400 to 2000 N, step-size of 100 N, 15,000 cycles/step, 20 Hz). Fractography, surface topography, roughness, and fractal dimension analyses were performed. LDPRESS[EP] group depicted higher FFL, CFF and survival probabilities in comparison to LDCAD groups, regardless of the conditioning method. A tendency of higher Weibull modulus (mechanical reliability) was observed when using [EP] for both LDPRESS and LDCAD. SEM and AFM analysis showed very distinct initial surface patterns for the distinct processing techniques considered (LDCAD with higher fractal dimension and lower roughness than LDPRESS), and both surface treatments distinctly affected these surface characteristics. All failures were radial cracks originating at the ceramic-cement interface. Pressed lithium-disilicate monolithic crowns showed better fatigue performance in comparison to CAD/CAM milled crowns, especially when they were treated with self-etching ceramic primer. The surface treatment with self-etching primer led to similar fatigue performance when compared to hydrofluoric acid plus silane application for the same processing technique, but it tended to provide higher mechanical reliability. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect