Estimation of liver volume in the western Indian population
Autor: | Rashmi Badhe, Mohammed Rela, Ravi Mohanka, Parijat Gupte, Akash Shukla, Gaurav Chaubal, Upasna Bahure, Vibhor V. Borkar, Somnath Chattopadhyay, Guruprasad Shetty, Samir Shah, Ashlesha S. Udare |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2016 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Liver volume Population India 030230 surgery Young Adult 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Living Donors medicine Humans education Body surface area Donor hepatectomy education.field_of_study business.industry Gastroenterology Healthy subjects Indian population Mean age Organ Size Liver Transplantation Liver Female 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology Radiology Tomography X-Ray Computed Nuclear medicine business Living donor liver transplantation |
Zdroj: | Indian Journal of Gastroenterology. 35:274-279 |
ISSN: | 0975-0711 0254-8860 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12664-016-0662-z |
Popis: | A number of formulae to estimate standard liver volume (SLV) exist. However, studies have shown that only certain formulae are applicable to a particular patient population, whereas the other formulae have not been accurate in estimating the SLV. Aim of this study was to assess which formula is most accurate in estimating SLV in the western Indian population. Data for donors of living donor liver transplantation from September 2014 to July 2015 was analyzed. Liver volumes were measured using computed tomography volumetry (CTV). SLV was calculated using formulae by the currently existing formulae. The mean SLV and CTV, percentage error in the SLV, and the correlation between SLV and CTV were calculated. Fifty-nine healthy subjects underwent donor hepatectomy [28 (47.5 %) males]. The mean age, mean body mass index (BMI), and mean body surface area (BSA) were 31.8 ± 8.8 years, 23.8 ± 3.7 kg/m2, and 1.6 ± 0.4, respectively. Mean CTV was 1178 ± 246.8 mL. Difference between mean SLV and mean CTV ranged from −133.5 (±189) mL to 632.2 (±190.2) mL. Mean SLV was significantly different from CTV by all the formulae except Urata. Percentage of population whose SLV was within 15 % of the mean CTV ranged from 1.7 % to 67.8 %, with the highest percentage obtained by using Fu-Gui’s formula. However, there was wide inter-individual variation on scatter plots between SLV and CTV by both these formulae. Currently existing formulae were not accurate in estimating SLV in our population. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |