Assessment of physiological barriers to nutrition following critical illness
| Autor: | James Whitehead, Bethany Dunn, Luke M Weinel, Lee-anne S. Chapple, Kylie Lange, Matthew J. Summers, Marianne J. Chapman, Rhea Louis |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Critical Illness Population Nutritional Status Calorimetry Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine Gastroenterology law.invention law Internal medicine medicine Humans Prospective Studies education APACHE education.field_of_study Nutrition and Dietetics Gastric emptying APACHE II business.industry Critically ill Area under the curve Middle Aged Intensive care unit Respiration Artificial Confidence interval Intensive Care Units Glucose Nutrition Assessment Gastric Emptying Intestinal Absorption Case-Control Studies Critical illness Female business |
| Zdroj: | Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland). 41(1) |
| ISSN: | 1532-1983 |
| Popis: | Summary Background & aims Nutrition may be important for recovery from critical illness. Gastrointestinal dysfunction is a key barrier to nutrition delivery in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and metabolic rate is elevated exacerbating nutritional deficits. Whether these factors persist following ICU discharge is unknown. We assessed whether delayed gastric emptying (GE) and impaired glucose absorption persist post-ICU discharge. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted in mechanically ventilated adults at 3 time-points: in ICU (V1); on the post-ICU ward (V2); and 3-months after ICU discharge (V3); and compared to age-matched healthy volunteers. On each visit, all participants received a test-meal containing 100 ml of 1 kcal/ml liquid nutrient, labelled with 0.1 g 13C-octanoic acid and 3 g 3-O-Methyl-glucose (3-OMG), and breath and blood samples were collected over 240min to quantify GE (gastric emptying coefficient (GEC)), and glucose absorption (3-OMG concentration; area under the curve (AUC)). Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) and differences shown with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Results Twenty-six critically ill patients completed V1 (M:F 20:6; 62.0 ± 2.9 y; BMI 29.8 ± 1.2 kg/m2; APACHE II 19.7 ± 1.9), 15 completed V2 and eight completed V3; and were compared to 10 healthy volunteers (M:F 6:4; 60.5 ± 7.5 y; BMI 26.0 ± 1.0 kg/m2). GE was significantly slower on V1 compared to health (GEC difference: −0.96 (95%CI -1.61, −0.31); and compared to V2 (−0.73 (−1.16, −0.31) and V3 (−1.03 (−1.47, −0.59). GE at V2 and V3 were not different to that in health (V2: −0.23 (−0.61, 0.14); V3: 0.10 (−0.27, 0.46)). GEC: V1: 2.64 ± 0.19; V2: 3.37 ± 0.12; V3: 3.67 ± 0.10; health: 3.60 ± 0.13. Glucose absorption (3-OMG AUC0-240) was impaired on V1 compared to V2 (−37.9 (−64.2, −11.6)), and faster on V3 than in health (21.8 (0.14, 43.4) but absorption at V2 and V3 did not differ from health. Intestinal glucose absorption: V1: 63.8 ± 10.4; V2: 101.7 ± 7.0; V3: 111.9 ± 9.7; health: 90.7 ± 3.8. Conclusion This study suggests that delayed GE and impaired intestinal glucose absorption recovers rapidly post-ICU. This requires further confirmation in a larger population. The REINSTATE trial was prospectively registered at www.anzctr.org.au . Trial ID ACTRN12618000370202. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect