Community Exposure Assessment and Intervention Effectiveness at Trinity American Corporation, Glenola, North Carolina
| Autor: | Charles F. Redinger, William P. Robert, Steven P. Levine |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2001 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Polyurethanes Air pollution Industrial Waste medicine.disease_cause Environmental Illness Environmental protection Environmental health Agency (sociology) North Carolina medicine Humans Closure (psychology) Air quality index Exposure assessment Fence (finance) Air Pollutants business.industry Public health Public Health Environmental and Occupational Health Community-Institutional Relations United States Intervention (law) Epidemiological Monitoring Odorants Organizational Case Studies United States Dept. of Health and Human Services Maximum Allowable Concentration Toluene 2 4-Diisocyanate business Filtration Environmental Monitoring |
| Zdroj: | AIHAJ - American Industrial Hygiene Association. 62:649-657 |
| ISSN: | 1529-8663 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/15298660108984665 |
| Popis: | This case study was a critical investigation of the analytical methodology and exposure assessment components of an intervention that led to the closure of a polyurethane foaming plant in Glenola, N.C., where plant neighbors reported a wide range of adverse health effects. Resident complaints and reports of nuisance odors and health effects persisted for many years, coming to a head in late 1995 and early 1996. Central to state and federal agency activities was the determination of the concentrations of air contaminants including toluene diisocyanate (TDI) at the plant fence line to establish an empirical foundation for resident complaints. Well over 2000 air concentration measurements were collected in the 18-month period prior to intervention and plant closure in September 1997. Results showed that flawed methodology, including poor quality assurance and improper interpretation of the data, may have led to improper conclusions and the inappropriate closing of this facility. Agency data did not show that ambient air concentrations of TDI at the plant fence line exceeded any required or recommended concentration limit. Furthermore, the identity and concentration of other air contaminants were not thoroughly investigated. Key lessons learned are that such interventions must be based on well-designed and executed exposure assessments. Resultant risk determinations must be based on sound science and methods. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|