Comparison of multi-institutional Varian ProBeam pencil beam scanning proton beam commissioning data
| Autor: | Ulrich W. Langner, J. Eley, K Langen, Lei Dong |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2017 |
| Předmět: |
87.55.Qr Quality assurance in radiotherapy
Materials science Probeam Bragg peak 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Optics Proton Therapy Dosimetry Radiation Oncology Physics Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Pencil-beam scanning Radiometry Instrumentation Proton therapy Monitor unit Radiation business.industry Isocenter Reproducibility of Results Radiotherapy Dosage Pencil (optics) spot scanning 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Ionization chamber Calibration 87.55.km Verification Proton business |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics |
| ISSN: | 1526-9914 |
| Popis: | Purpose Commissioning beam data for proton spot scanning beams are compared for the first two Varian ProBeam sites in the United States, at the Maryland Proton Treatment Center (MPTC) and Scripps Proton Therapy Center (SPTC). In addition, the extent to which beams can be matched between gantry rooms at MPTC is investigated. Method Beam data for the two sites were acquired with independent dosimetry systems and compared. Integrated depth dose curves (IDDs) were acquired with Bragg peak ion chambers in a 3D water tank for pencil beams at both sites. Spot profiles were acquired at different distances from the isocenter at a gantry angle of 0° as well as a function of gantry angles. Absolute dose calibration was compared between SPTC and the gantries at MPTC. Dosimetric verification of test plans, output as a function of gantry angle, monitor unit (MU) linearity, end effects, dose rate dependence, and plan reproducibility were compared for different gantries at MPTC. Results The IDDs for the two sites were similar, except in the plateau region, where the SPTC data were on average 4.5% higher for lower energies. This increase in the plateau region decreased as energy increased, with no marked difference for energies higher than 180 MeV. Range in water coincided for all energies within 0.5 mm. The sigmas of the spot profiles in air were within 10% agreement at isocenter. This difference increased as detector distance from the isocenter increased. Absolute doses for the gantries measured at both sites were within 1% agreement. Test plans, output as function of gantry angle, MU linearity, end effects, dose rate dependence, and plan reproducibility were all within tolerances given by TG142. Conclusion Beam data for the two sites and between different gantry rooms were well matched. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text