On the importance of quality assurance (QA) for COMS eye plaque Silastic inserts: A guide to measurement methods, typical variations, and an example of how QA intercepted a manufacturing aberration
| Autor: | Courtney C. Oare, Clara Ferreira, T Herman, Jordan Mc Cauley Cutsinger, Christopher L. Deufel |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Systematic error
Computer science Brachytherapy quality assurance Iodine Radioisotopes Silastic Humans Radiation Oncology Physics Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Dimethylpolysiloxanes Instrumentation Measurement method Insert (composites) Radiation business.industry Eye Neoplasms Radiotherapy Dosage LDR brachytherapy Manufacturing variability Homogeneous Design standard uveal melanoma business Monte Carlo Method Quality assurance eye plaque Biomedical engineering |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics |
| ISSN: | 1526-9914 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/acm2.13325 |
| Popis: | Purpose Eye plaques are widely used for ocular melanoma and provide an effective alternative to enucleation with adequate tumor control. A COMS plaque utilizes a Silastic insert for precise positioning of the radioactive seeds with respect to the scleral surface of the eye; however, due to manufacturing variability, the insert may unintentionally increase or decrease the distance between the sources and tumor. The purpose of this work is to provide guidance in measuring and identifying outliers in Silastic inserts. The importance of regular quality assurance (QA) is illustrated in an experience where a systematic problem was detected and the manufacturer's 22‐mm mold was corrected. Methods A detailed description of the molds and manufacturing process used to produce Silastic inserts is provided, including photographs of the process steps. The variability in Silastic insert production was evaluated by measuring the thickness of 124 Silastic inserts. An estimate of how the observed Silastic thickness discrepancies impact the dose to the tumor and critical eye structures was performed using homogeneous dose calculations. A standard QA protocol was developed to guide the clinical user. Results Thickness of the measured Silastic inserts ranged from 1.22 to 2.67 mm, demonstrating variation from the 2.25 mm standard. Six of the 22‐mm inserts were outliers (Δthickness >3 standard deviations) and were excluded from the statistics. The outliers were investigated with the help of the manufacturer, who discovered that a systematic error was accidentally introduced into the 22‐mm mold. Conclusions Due to manufacturing errors or variability, the Silastic inserts used in COMS eye plaques may be thicker or thinner than the design standard. Such variations may impact tumor control or increase the risk of normal tissue side effects. A standardized QA program is recommended to detect variations and communicate unusual findings to the manufacturer. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text