Measurement properties of all versions of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL) 2.0: a systematic review protocol
| Autor: | May Khin Thein, Aye Su Su Win, Thida Win Myint, Khin Sanda Tun |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Gerontology
Protocol (science) Adult education.field_of_study Consensus media_common.quotation_subject Population MEDLINE Reproducibility of Results medicine.disease Stroke Data extraction Quality of life medicine Quality of Life Humans Quality (business) Survivors education Psychology General Nursing Reliability (statistics) media_common Systematic Reviews as Topic |
| Zdroj: | JBI evidence synthesis. 19(2) |
| ISSN: | 2689-8381 |
| Popis: | Objective The aim of this review is to critically appraise and summarize the quality of the measurement properties of all versions of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL) version 2.0. Introduction The Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale version 2.0 was developed as a comprehensive measure in assessing the quality of life of stroke survivors. The shortened version and cross-culturally translated versions are further developed in different countries. A systematic review will clarify the levels of reliability and validity of all versions. Inclusion criteria The population of interest for this review will include adult stroke survivors of either sex diagnosed with a stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) who have no other comorbidities affecting their quality of life. The SS-QOL version 2.0 will be the specific instrument of interest, and the quality of life of stroke survivors will be the construct of interest in this review. The measures of reliability, validity, and responsiveness will be assessed as outcomes. Only the studies evaluating the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of all versions of the SS-QOL 2.0 will be included in the review. Methods A literature search will be conducted for published studies in MEDLINE and Embase, and unpublished data in Google Scholar and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. After a three-step search strategy, study selection will be done by two reviewers independently. Then, the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology will be applied for assessment of methodological quality, data extraction, and synthesis. Systematic review registration number PROSPERO CRD42020211727. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|