Cost-effectiveness of preventing first-episode psychosis in ultra-high-risk subjects

Autor: Don H. Linszen, Lex Wunderink, D.H. Nieman, Filip Smit, Nynke Boonstra, Rianne M. C. Klaassen, N. S. P. Savelsberg, Wim Veling, Helga K. Ising, S. Dragt, Judith Rietdijk, M. van der Gaag
Přispěvatelé: Psychiatrie & Neuropsychologie, RS: MHeNs - R2 - Mental Health, ANS - Amsterdam Neuroscience, APH - Amsterdam Public Health, Adult Psychiatry, Clinical Psychology, EMGO+ - Mental Health, Perceptual and Cognitive Neuroscience (PCN), Clinical Cognitive Neuropsychiatry Research Program (CCNP), Epidemiology and Data Science, EMGO - Mental health
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2015
Předmět:
Adult
Male
Risk
medicine.medical_specialty
Adolescent
Cost effectiveness
medicine.medical_treatment
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Psychological intervention
1ST EPISODE
QUESTIONNAIRE
ECONOMIC-EVALUATION
EARLY INTERVENTION
Disease-Free Survival
VALIDATION
law.invention
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Young Adult
Randomized controlled trial
law
HELP-SEEKING POPULATION
Outcome Assessment
Health Care

medicine
Humans
psychosis
quality-adjusted life years
Psychiatry
COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY
Applied Psychology
health care economics and organizations
METAANALYSIS
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
ultra-high-risk patients
Prevention
Cost-effectiveness analysis
STATE
Quality-adjusted life year
Cognitive behavioral therapy
Psychiatry and Mental health
Cognitive Therapy
Psychotic Disorders
Economic evaluation
Cognitive therapy
Physical therapy
Female
Psychology
FOLLOW-UP
Follow-Up Studies
Zdroj: Ising, H K, Smit, H F E, Veling, W, Rietdijk, J, Dragt, S, Klaassen, R M C, Savelsberg, N S P, Boonstra, N, Linszen, D H, Wunderink, L & van der Gaag, M 2015, ' Cost-effectiveness of preventing first-episode psychosis in ultra-high-risk subjects: Multi-centre randomized controlled trial ', Psychological Medicine, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1435-1446 . https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291714002530
Psychological Medicine, 45(7), 1435-46. Cambridge University Press
Psychological medicine, 45(7), 1435-1446. Cambridge University Press
Psychological Medicine, 45(7), 1435-1446. Cambridge University Press
ISSN: 0033-2917
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291714002530
Popis: BackgroundAlthough there is evidence for the effectiveness of interventions for psychosis among ultra-high-risk (UHR) groups, health economic evaluations are lacking. This study aimed to determine the cost effectiveness and cost–utility of cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) to prevent first-episode psychosis.MethodThe Dutch Early Detection and Intervention Evaluation study was a randomized controlled trial of 196 UHR patients with an 18-month follow-up. All participants were treated with routine care (RC) for non-psychotic disorders. The experimental group (n = 95) received add-on CBT to prevent first-episode psychosis. We report the intervention, medical and travel costs, as well as costs arising from loss of productivity. Treatment response was defined as psychosis-free survival and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained.ResultsIn the cost-effectiveness analysis, the proportion of averted psychoses was significantly higher in the CBT condition (89.5% v. 76.2%). CBT showed a 63.7% probability of being more cost effective, because it was less costly than RC by US$844 (£551) per prevented psychosis. In the cost–utility analysis, QALY health gains were slightly higher for CBT than for RC (0.60 v. 0.57) and the CBT intervention had a 52.3% probability of being the superior treatment because, for equal or better QALY gains, the costs of CBT were lower than those of RC.ConclusionsAdd-on preventive CBT for UHR resulted in a significant reduction in the incidence of first psychosis. QALY gains show little difference between the two conditions. The CBT intervention proved to be cost saving.
Databáze: OpenAIRE