A case–control study of breast cancer risk and ambient exposure to pesticides
Autor: | Kaveh Shahabi, Anna H. Wu, Paul K. Mills, John Wilson, Carrie Tayour, Beate Ritz, Bryan Langholz, Myles Cockburn |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Epidemiology
Exposure Assessment Health Toxicology and Mutagenesis Chlordane 010501 environmental sciences 01 natural sciences 03 medical and health sciences chemistry.chemical_compound 0302 clinical medicine Breast cancer Geographical Information Systems Pesticide drift Environmental health Medicine Aldrin Dicofol 030212 general & internal medicine Pesticides 0105 earth and related environmental sciences Exposure assessment Original Research 2. Zero hunger Global and Planetary Change business.industry Public Health Environmental and Occupational Health Pesticide medicine.disease Pollution 3. Good health chemistry 13. Climate action Chlorpyrifos business |
Zdroj: | Environmental Epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) |
ISSN: | 2474-7882 |
Popis: | Because lifetime estrogen exposure is a key factor in breast cancer development, exposure to endocrine-disrupting pesticides might contribute to breast cancer development.1–3 While the estrogenic properties of some pesticides have been established,4–6 results from previous studies of pesticide exposure on breast cancer risk are conflicting: some studies show a positive association,7–11 while others are null.12–20 Many previous epidemiologic studies relied upon self-reported exposure based on pesticide usage, occupation, or living on a farm.11,14,17–20 Aside from a cohort study which did find some associations for specific pesticides,7,13 the majority of these studies grouped together pesticides with varying toxicologic effects, likely leading to nondifferential exposure misclassification and reported null effects that may have obscured associations with specific chemicals. Other studies used ecologic designs,16 spatial regression,8,9 or proximity to aggregated pesticide data at only one residential location.10,15,20 Studies that use biomarkers to measure pesticide metabolites in serum samples taken near the time of cancer diagnosis may not reflect previous exposures that are most relevant for breast cancer etiology and do not reflect long-term exposure.21 There is a need for research methodologies that can reconstruct exposures occurring decades before diagnosis and evaluate pesticide-specific exposures on breast cancer risk.22,23 We conducted a case–control study of breast cancer risk from exposure to pesticides using a Geographical Information Systems (GIS)–based method that combines geocoded residential and occupational histories with state pesticide use reports and land use data24 in California’s highest-ranking counties (Fresno, Tulare, and Kern) for agricultural density and commercial pesticide use in the United States.25 In highly agricultural regions, pesticide drift from neighboring application sites presents a major source of nonoccupational exposure.26–30 We evaluated a group of structurally and toxicologically similar31 organochlorine pesticides with known estrogenic effects that are most likely related to breast carcinogenesis because of their ability to accumulate in adipose tissue and potential to act synergistically (aldrin, chlordane, dicofol, dieldrin, endosulfan, lindane, methoxychlor, and toxaphene).3,5,32–36 We also assessed breast cancer risk from exposure to three commonly applied pesticides in the region (chlorpyrifos, diazinon, and 1,3-dichloropropene) detected at levels of concern to human health in air monitoring conducted by the California Department of Pesticide Regulation (CDPR) in 2006 in a Fresno County farming community.37 Because no regulatory ambient air standards exist for most pesticides, CDPR developed health-based screening levels for 35 pesticides and found that diazinon exceeded its screening level, chlorpyrifos approached its screening level and was frequently detected, and 1,3-dichloropropene exceeded its cancer potency value. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |