Semaglutide improves postprandial glucose and lipid metabolism, and delays first‐hour gastric emptying in subjects with obesity
Autor: | Julie Hjerpsted, Mads Axelsen, John E. Blundell, Trine Kvist, Anne Flint, Ashley Brooks |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Blood Glucose Male medicine.medical_specialty Endocrinology Diabetes and Metabolism medicine.medical_treatment glucose metabolism insulin analogues Injections Subcutaneous Glucagon-Like Peptides 030209 endocrinology & metabolism phase I‐II study 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology Placebo Glucagon Drug Administration Schedule 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Endocrinology Double-Blind Method GLP‐1 analogue Internal medicine Internal Medicine medicine Humans Hypoglycemic Agents Obesity Cross-Over Studies Gastric emptying business.industry Semaglutide Insulin Original Articles Fasting Lipid Metabolism Postprandial Period Crossover study Postprandial Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 Gastric Emptying Peptide YY obesity therapy Original Article incretin therapy Female business |
Zdroj: | Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism |
ISSN: | 1463-1326 1462-8902 |
Popis: | Aim: To investigate the effects of semaglutide on fasting and postprandial glucose and lipid responses, and on gastric emptying. Materials and Methods: This was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period, crossover trial. Subjects with obesity (N = 30) received once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide, dose-escalated to 1.0 mg, or placebo. After each 12-week treatment period, glucose and lipid metabolism were assessed before and after standardised meals. Gastric emptying (paracetamol absorption test) and peptide YY (PYY) response were also assessed. Results: Semaglutide treatment significantly lowered fasting concentrations of glucose and glucagon, and increased insulin versus placebo (estimated treatment ratio: 0.95 [95% confidence interval: 0.91, 0.98]; 0.86 [0.75, 0.98]; 1.45 [1.20, 1.75], respectively). Postprandial glucose metabolism significantly improved with semaglutide versus placebo (incremental area under the curve 0–5 hours [iAUC0-5h]; estimated treatment difference: glucose −1.34 mmol*h/L [−2.42, −0.27]; insulin −921 pmol*h/L [−1461, −381]; C-peptide −1.42 nmol*h/L [−2.33, −0.51]). Fasting and postprandial lipid metabolism improved with semaglutide versus placebo. First-hour gastric emptying after the meal was delayed versus placebo (AUC0-1h; estimated treatment ratio: 0.73 [0.61, 0.87]). Fasting and postprandial lipid metabolism improved with semaglutide versus placebo. First-hour gastric emptying after the meal was delayed versus placebo (AUC0-1h; estimated treatment ratio: 0.73 [0.61, 0.87); this may have contributed to the lower postprandial glucose increase in semaglutide-treated subjects. Overall gastric emptying (AUC0-5h) was not statistically different between treatments. Fasting and postprandial PYY responses were significantly lower with semaglutide versus placebo (p=0.0397 and p=0.0097, respectively). Conclusion: Semaglutide improved fasting and postprandial glucose and lipid metabolism. Overall gastric emptying was similar to placebo; however, the observed first-hour delay with semaglutide may contribute to a slower entry of glucose into the circulation. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |