| Autor: |
Heidi S. Donovan, Madeleine Courtney-Brooks, Joseph L. Kelley, Robert M. Arnold, Janet Arida, Winifred Teuteberg, Dio Kavalieratos, Carolyn Lefkowits |
| Rok vydání: |
2016 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Gynecologic Oncology. 141:130 |
| ISSN: |
0090-8258 |
| DOI: |
10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.04.344 |
| Popis: |
37 Background: Prognosis affects decision making by providers and patients and accurate understanding of prognosis may help avoid futile end-of-life care. Gynecologic oncology (GO) patient and provider perspectives on discussing prognosis have not been described. We sought to analyze patient and provider preferences regarding timing, amount and type of information included in discussions of prognosis. Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews regarding palliative care with 19 GO providers (7 physicians, 7 advanced practice providers, 5 nurses) and 29 patients with advanced or recurrent gynecologic cancer at an academic medical center. Communication about prognosis was one interview domain. Two coders independently and iteratively analyzed transcripts using qualitative analysis. Results: Median patient age was 61, the most common cancer was ovary (59%) and 90% had recurrent disease. Providers were 74% female with median 15 years in practice. Themes included patients wanting frank discussions about prognosis, not limited to life expectancy. Further preferences regarding timing and content were individualized. All categories of providers reported having prognosis conversations. Providers saw these conversations as part of their clinical role, though they often found them difficult. Providers commonly equated prognosis purely with life expectancy. Providers recognized variation among patients in preferences regarding these conversations, but did not discuss asking patients directly about their preferences. Conclusions: GO patients want frank discussions about what the future might hold, often including but not limited to life expectancy. Providers see these discussions as being within their scope of practice but often find them difficult. Opportunities exist for provider education regarding communication skills for assessing patient preferences and conducting patient centered prognosis discussions. Education should include GO physicians, advanced practice providers and nurses. Collaboration with specialty palliative care providers could facilitate that education and provide assistance with challenging cases. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect