The posterior auditory field is the chief generator of prediction error signals in the auditory cortex
| Autor: | Erich Schröger, Gloria G. Parras, Manuel S. Malmierca, Lorena Casado-Román |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Predictive coding
Auditory cortical fields Stimulus-specific adaptation medicine.medical_specialty Field (physics) Mismatch negativity Cognitive Neuroscience Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry Audiology Auditory cortex computer.software_genre Repetition suppression Reaction Time medicine Animals Audio signal processing Oddball paradigm Mathematics Auditory Cortex Neurons Single units Repetition (rhetorical device) Neural adaptation Functional specialization Electroencephalography Adaptation Physiological Rats medicine.anatomical_structure Acoustic Stimulation Neurology Auditory Perception Evoked Potentials Auditory Female computer RC321-571 |
| Zdroj: | NeuroImage, Vol 242, Iss, Pp 118446-(2021) |
| ISSN: | 1053-8119 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118446 |
| Popis: | The auditory cortex (AC) encompasses distinct fields subserving partly different aspects of sound processing. One essential function of the AC is the detection of unpredicted sounds, as revealed by differential neural activity to predictable and unpredictable sounds. According to the predictive coding framework, this effect can be explained by repetition suppression and/or prediction error signaling. The present study investigates functional specialization of the rat AC fields in repetition suppression and prediction error by combining a tone frequency oddball paradigm (involving high-probable standard and low-probable deviant tones) with two different control sequences (many-standards and cascade). Tones in the control sequences were comparable to deviant events with respect to neural adaptation but were not violating a regularity. Therefore, a difference in the neural activity between deviant and control tones indicates a prediction error effect, whereas a difference between control and standard tones indicates a repetition suppression effect. Single-unit recordings revealed by far the largest prediction error effects for the posterior auditory field, while the primary auditory cortex, the anterior auditory field, the ventral auditory field, and the suprarhinal auditory field were dominated by repetition suppression effects. Statistically significant repetition suppression effects occurred in all AC fields, whereas prediction error effects were less robust in the primary auditory cortex and the anterior auditory field. Results indicate that the non-lemniscal, posterior auditory field is more engaged in context-dependent processing underlying deviance-detection than the other AC fields, which are more sensitive to stimulus-dependent effects underlying differential degrees of neural adaptation. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect