Effect of different fabrication steps on color and translucency of a CAD‐CAM feldspathic ceramic
Autor: | Gilbert Jorquera, Anai Avila, Carla Cordero, Camila S. Sampaio, Vanina Ferrari, Maria Freitte, Pablo J. Atria, Joyce Belfus |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Ceramics
Fabrication Materials science Color difference Surface Properties 0206 medical engineering Color Polishing 030206 dentistry 02 engineering and technology Dental Porcelain 020601 biomedical engineering Feldspathic ceramic 03 medical and health sciences Glazing Substrate (building) 0302 clinical medicine CEREC visual_art Materials Testing visual_art.visual_art_medium Computer-Aided Design Ceramic Composite material General Dentistry |
Zdroj: | Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 33:1038-1044 |
ISSN: | 1708-8240 1496-4155 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jerd.12789 |
Popis: | Objective To evaluate color differences (ΔE) of different fabrication steps performed on a feldspathic ceramic and relative translucency parameter (RTP) after glazing; and to evaluate their effects on the color parameters: L*, a* and b*. Material and methods Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) feldspathic maxillary right central incisor ceramic crowns (Cerec Blocs; 1.4 mm thickness) were fabricated through scanning a model preparation and milling. A total of 20 specimens were used and different parameters were compared with each other for color difference (ΔE): original block, milling, polishing, glazing and try-in cements; RTP was measured after glazing. Color parameters (L*, a*, and b*) were evaluated after each step with a spectrophotometer (Vita Easyshade V) and compared using the CIEDE2000 formula. Statistical analyses were done using one-way ANOVA and post-hoc tests. Results The highest ΔE value was observed for Original versus Milling group (4.73) and the lowest for Polishing versus Glazing (0.49). RTP after glazing presented a value of 12.01. L*, a*, and b* parameters were different among groups. Milling group was the one that presented more differences compared to the Original block regarding L*, a*, and b* parameters. Conclusions Different fabrication steps resulted in perceptible color differences within themselves, and L*, a*, and b* parameters changed according to each step. All milling specimens presented unacceptable color differences when compared to the other steps, and milling specimens showed all color parameters (L*, a*, and b*) statistically different compared to the Original block. A high RTP value was observed, demonstrating that, at 1.4 mm thickness, the feldspathic ceramic presented high translucency, showing that opacification of substrate might be necessary. Clinical significance Different fabrication steps can greatly affect the optical properties of the feldspathic ceramic restoration studied and cause a relevant impact when compared to the ceramic block itself. Crowns evaluated right after milling presented the highest color differences. In order to obtain optical properties as close as possible to the original feldspathic ceramic block, either polishing or polishing and glazing needs to be performed. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |