Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Ultrasonic Method and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Combined with Intraoral Scanning and Prosthetic-Driven Implant Planning Method in Determining the Gingival Phenotype in the Healthy Periodontium
| Autor: | Magdalena Bednarz-Tumidajewicz, Aneta Furtak, Aneta Zakrzewska, Małgorzata Rąpała, Karolina Gerreth, Tomasz Gedrange, Wojciech Bednarz |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2022 |
| Předmět: |
Incisor
Periodontium Phenotype Health Toxicology and Mutagenesis Public Health Environmental and Occupational Health Ultrasonics Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ultrasound cone-beam computed tomography digital scanning phenotype gingival thickness dental implants gingival recession peri-implantitis periodontitis |
| Zdroj: | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health; Volume 19; Issue 19; Pages: 12276 |
| ISSN: | 1660-4601 |
| DOI: | 10.3390/ijerph191912276 |
| Popis: | The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two diagnostic methods: ultrasonic gingival thickness measurement (UGTM) and cone-beam computed tomography, intraoral scanning by computer-aided design technology with prosthetic-driven implant planning software (CBCT/CAD/PDIP) in determining the gingival phenotype (GP). Thirty periodontally healthy patients were examined. The ultrasonic device Pirop G® with a frequency of 20 MHz and CBCT/CAD/PDIP were used to measure gingival thickness at upper canines and incisors in three points localized midbuccally, namely free gingival thickness (FGT), supracrestal (SGT) and crestal (CGT). Probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL) and width of keratinized tissue (WKT) were measured using periodontal probe. Intra-examiner and inter-examiner agreement and agreement between methods were evaluated using Bland-Altman analyses. Comparing both methods in the determination of SGT (bias = 0.17 mm, SD = 0.25 mm, p < 0.000) and CGT (bias = −0.45 mm, SD = 0.32 mm, p < 0.000) 95.0% and 95.6% agreement were found, respectively, and in the FGT range only 93.3% (bias = −0.45 mm, SD = 0.32 mm, p < 0.000). The presence of positive correlations between WKT and SGT was shown. A positive correlation between SGT and WKT confirms the purpose of measuring these parameters for the evaluation of the GP. Both the ultrasonic method and cone-beam computed tomography combined with intraoral scanning and prosthetic-driven implant planning method were useful in determining gingival phenotype, however, the ultrasonic method was more accurate for measuring GT. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|