Diagnostic and therapeutic workup of male infertility: results from a Delphi consensus panel
| Autor: | Luca Boeri, Alessandro Palmieri, T. Tony Cai, Bruno Giammusso, Paolo Verze, Ilaria Ortensi, Andrea Salonia, Carlos Miacola, Paolo Capogrosso |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Boeri, L., Capogrosso, P., Ortensi, I., Miacola, C., Cai, T., Verze, P., Salonia, A., Giammusso, B., Palmieri, A. |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
business.industry Urology media_common.quotation_subject education medicine.disease Male infertility Likert scale Clinical Practice Hot topics Voting Family medicine medicine Male factor infertility business Socioeconomic status computer Delphi media_common computer.programming_language |
| Popis: | Male factor infertility (MFI) is a rising issue worldwide with significant socioeconomic costs and negative psychological consequences for the couple. Current guidelines provide recommendations for its diagnosis and treatment but several gaps in the management of MFI are encountered in clinical practice due to the lack of available evidence in published literature. Uncertainty in the management of MFI cases leads to a high degree of variability in therapeutic approaches. We planned a Delphi consensus method to provide insights and help bridge the gaps that separate clinical guidelines from real-world practice. The Advisory Board collected 41 statements on debated topics in the management of MFI, each including multiple items designed as a 5-point Likert scale. The questionnaire was sent by e-mail to a panel of Italian experts for a first round of voting; members of the panel were later invited to a second round of voting, preceded by discussion of the "hot topics" identified in the first round. At both rounds of the Delphi consensus 68 experts participated to the voting process. After the first round 25 statements were identified as hot topics, and these underwent the second round of voting. Consensus was reached on many, but not all cases, leaving vagueness on few debated topics where decisions are unsupported by clinical studies or driven by controversial results. In conclusion, indications emerging from this large panel of experts may help guide the management of male factor infertility in clinical practice. Studies are needed to address unanswered questions left by cases for whom no consensus was reached. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|