Protocol-driven remote monitoring of cardiac resynchronization therapy as part of a heart failure disease management strategy

Autor: Pieter M. Vandervoort, Hélène De Cannière, Christophe J.P. Smeets, Lars Grieten, Inge M Thijs, Dorien Lanssens, Matthias Dupont, Jo Van der Auwera, Julie Vranken, Thijs Vandenberk, Frederik H. Verbrugge, Wilfried Mullens, Valerie Storms
Přispěvatelé: Clinical sciences, Medicine and Pharmacy academic/administration, Cardiology, Intensive Care
Rok vydání: 2017
Předmět:
Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Time Factors
genetic structures
medicine.medical_treatment
Cardiac resynchronization therapy
030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Clinical Protocols
Internal medicine
medicine
Telemetry
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/methods
Humans
Registries
cardiovascular diseases
030212 general & internal medicine
Disease management (health)
Monitoring
Physiologic

Aged
Heart Failure
Protocol (science)
Ejection fraction
business.industry
Follow up studies
Disease Management
General Medicine
equipment and supplies
medicine.disease
Telemetry/methods
Heart failure
Monitoring
Physiologic/methods

Practice Guidelines as Topic
Heart Failure/therapy
cardiovascular system
Cardiology
Female
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
business
Follow-Up Studies
circulatory and respiratory physiology
Zdroj: Acta Cardiologica. 73:230-239
ISSN: 0373-7934
0001-5385
Popis: BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) is an established treatment for heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. CRT devices are equipped with remote monitoring functions, which are pivotal in the detection of device problems, but may also facilitate disease management. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive overview of the clinical interventions taken based on remote monitoring. METHODS: This is a single centre observational study of consecutive CRT patients (n = 192) participating in protocol-driven remote follow-up. Incoming technical- and disease-related alerts were analysed together with subsequently triggered interventions. RESULTS: During 34 ± 13 months of follow-up, 1372 alert-containing notifications were received (2.53 per patient-year of follow-up), comprising 1696 unique alerts (3.12 per patient-year of follow-up). In 60%, notifications resulted in a phone contact. Technical alerts constituted 8% of incoming alerts (0.23 per patient-year of follow-up). Rhythm (1.43 per patient-year of follow-up) and bioimpedance alerts (0.98 per patient-year of follow-up) were the most frequent disease-related alerts. Notifications included a rhythm alert in 39%, which triggered referral to the emergency room (4%), outpatient cardiology clinic (36%) or general practitioner (7%), or resulted in medication changes (13%). Sole bioimpedance notifications resulted in a telephone contact in 91%, which triggered outpatient evaluation in 8% versus medication changes in 10%. Clinical outcome was excellent with 97% 1-year survival. CONCLUSIONS: Remote CRT follow-up resulted in 0.23 technical- versus 2.64 disease-related alerts annually. Rhythm and bioimpedance notifications constituted the majority of incoming notifications which triggered an actual intervention in 22% and 15% of cases, respectively.
Databáze: OpenAIRE