Physiological ICSI (PICSI) vs. Conventional ICSI in Couples with Male Factor: A Systematic Review
| Autor: | Esperanza Carballo-Mondragón, Jaime Enoc Zambrano-Guerrero, Miguel Ángel Checa-Vizcaíno, Juana Rivero-Murillo, Ana María Emilia Cañedo-Del Ángel, Georgina Avalos-Durán |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Pregnancy Rate Hyaluronic acid Clinical pregnancy Review Article Miscarriage Physiological ICSI 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Human fertilization Pregnancy hyaluronic acid medicine Humans 030212 general & internal medicine Sperm Injections Intracytoplasmic Male factor Infertility Male PICSI 030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine male factor business.industry Obstetrics Significant difference Outcome measures Pregnancy Outcome medicine.disease Spermatozoa Semen Analysis embryonic structures Female business physiological ICSI HA sperm selection Embryo quality Systematic search |
| Zdroj: | JBRA Assisted Reproduction Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona |
| ISSN: | 1518-0557 1517-5693 |
| Popis: | Objectives To determine the efficacy of the physiological ICSI technique (PICSI) vs. conventional ICSI in the prognosis of couples with male factor, with respect to the following outcome measures: live births, clinical pregnancy, implantation, embryo quality, fertilization and miscarriage rates. Methods A systematic review of the literature, extracting raw data and performing data analysis. Patient(s): Couples with the male factor, who were subjected to in-vitro fertilization. Main Outcome Measures: rates of live births, clinical pregnancy, implantation, embryo quality, fertilization and miscarriage. Results In the systematic search, we found 2,918 studies and an additional study from other sources; only two studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. The rates of live births, clinical pregnancy, implantation, embryo quality, fertilization and miscarriage were similar for both groups. Conclusion There is no statistically significant difference between PICSI vs. ICSI, for any of the outcomes analyzed in this study. Enough information is still not available to prove the efficacy of the PICSI technique over ICSI in couples with male factor. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|