Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System Speed and Accuracy Are Increased With the Use of a Semiautomated Computer Application

Autor: Toshimasa J. Clark, Suresh Maximin, Peter B. Sachs, Thomas F. Flood
Rok vydání: 2015
Předmět:
Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Decision support system
Lung Neoplasms
ComputingMethodologies_IMAGEPROCESSINGANDCOMPUTERVISION
computer.software_genre
Pattern Recognition
Automated

medicine
Humans
Computer Simulation
Radiology
Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Medical physics
Implementation
Decision Making
Computer-Assisted

Early Detection of Cancer
Solitary pulmonary nodule
Computer program
business.industry
Solitary Pulmonary Nodule
Nodule (medicine)
respiratory system
medicine.disease
Quality Improvement
United States
respiratory tract diseases
Radiology Information Systems
ComputingMethodologies_PATTERNRECOGNITION
Categorization
Radiographic Image Interpretation
Computer-Assisted

Table (database)
Female
Data mining
medicine.symptom
Tomography
X-Ray Computed

business
computer
Algorithms
Lung cancer screening
Zdroj: Journal of the American College of Radiology. 12:1301-1306
ISSN: 1546-1440
Popis: The Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS™) is an algorithm that can be used to classify lung nodules in patients with significant smoking histories. It is published in table format but can be implemented as a computer program. The aim of this study was to assess the efficiency and accuracy of the use of a computer program versus the table in categorizing lung nodules.The Lung-RADS algorithm was implemented as a computer program. Through the use of a survey tool, respondents were asked to categorize 13 simulated lung nodules using the computer program and the Lung-RADS table as published. Data were gathered regarding time to completion, accuracy of each nodule's categorization, users' subjective categorization confidence, and users' perceived efficiency using each method.The use of a computer program to categorize lung nodules resulted in significantly increased interpretation speed (80.8 ± 37.7 vs 156 ± 105 seconds, P.0001), lung nodule classification accuracy (99.6% vs 76.5%, P.0001), and perceived confidence and efficiency compared with the use of the table. There were no significant differences in accuracy when comparing thoracic radiologists with the remainder of the group.Radiologists were both more efficient and more accurate in lung nodule categorization when using computerized decision support tools. The authors propose that other institutions use computerized implementations of Lung-RADS in the interests of both efficiency and patient outcomes through proper management. Furthermore, they suggest the ACR design future iterations of the Lung-RADS algorithm with computerized decision support in mind.
Databáze: OpenAIRE