Marital status and prostate cancer incidence: a pooled analysis of 12 case–control studies from the PRACTICAL consortium
Autor: | C. Slavov, Radka Kaneva, Geraldine Cancel-Tassin, Azad Hassan Abdul Razack, Rosalind A. Eeles, Jong Y. Park, Nora Pashayan, Elaine A. Ostrander, Lixin Song, Manuela Gago-Dominguez, Charlotte Salmon, Olivier Cussenot, Apcb BioResource, Manolis Kogevinas, Jasmine Lim, Emilie Cordina-Duverger, Florence Menegaux, Jyotsna Batra, Javier Llorca, Suzanne K Chambers, Hui-Yi Lin, Jose E. Castelao, Zsofia Kote-Jarai, Janet L. Stanford, Marie-Élise Parent, Alison M. Dunning, Kenneth Muir |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Epidemiology business.industry Incidence (epidemiology) Case-control study Cancer consortium Odds ratio prostate cancer medicine.disease 3. Good health meta-analysis 03 medical and health sciences Prostate cancer 0302 clinical medicine 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Meta-analysis Marital status Medicine 030212 general & internal medicine pooled analysis business marital status Demography |
Zdroj: | European Journal of Epidemiology. 36:913-925 |
ISSN: | 1573-7284 0393-2990 |
Popis: | While being in a committed relationship is associated with a better prostate cancer prognosis, little is known about how marital status relates to its incidence. Social support provided by marriage/relationship could promote a healthy lifestyle and an increased healthcare seeking behavior. We investigated the association between marital status and prostate cancer risk using data from the PRACTICAL Consortium. Pooled analyses were conducted combining 12 case–control studies based on histologically-confirmed incident prostate cancers and controls with information on marital status prior to diagnosis/interview. Marital status was categorized as married/partner, separated/divorced, single, or widowed. Tumours with Gleason scores ≥ 8 defined high-grade cancers, and low-grade otherwise. NCI-SEER’s summary stages (local, regional, distant) indicated the extent of the cancer. Logistic regression was used to derive odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between marital status and prostate cancer risk, adjusting for potential confounders. Overall, 14,760 cases and 12,019 controls contributed to analyses. Compared to men who were married/with a partner, widowed men had an OR of 1.19 (95% CI 1.03–1.35) of prostate cancer, with little difference between low- and high-grade tumours. Risk estimates among widowers were 1.14 (95% CI 0.97–1.34) for local, 1.53 (95% CI 1.22–1.92) for regional, and 1.56 (95% CI 1.05–2.32) for distant stage tumours. Single men had elevated risks of high-grade cancers. Our findings highlight elevated risks of incident prostate cancer among widowers, more often characterized by tumours that had spread beyond the prostate at the time of diagnosis. Social support interventions and closer medical follow-up in this sub-population are warranted. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |