Did we get sensorimotor adaptation wrong? Implicit adaptation as direct policy updating rather than forward-model-based learning
| Autor: | Alkis M. Hadjiosif, Adrian M. Haith, John W. Krakauer |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male Adolescent Process (engineering) Computer science Task (project management) Theory based 03 medical and health sciences Young Adult 0302 clinical medicine Feedback Sensory Motor system Humans Learning Adaptation (computer science) Research Articles 030304 developmental biology Statement (computer science) 0303 health sciences Mechanism (biology) business.industry General Neuroscience Brain Adaptation Physiological Model based learning Female State (computer science) Artificial intelligence Motor learning business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Photic Stimulation Psychomotor Performance Cognitive psychology |
| Zdroj: | J Neurosci |
| DOI: | 10.1101/2020.01.22.914473 |
| Popis: | The human motor system can rapidly adapt its motor output in response to errors. The prevailing theory of this process posits that the motor system adapts an internal forward model that predicts the consequences of outgoing motor commands and uses this forward model to plan future movements. However, despite clear evidence that adaptive forward models exist and are used to help track the state of the body, there is no definitive evidence that such models are used in movement planning. An alternative to the forward-model-based theory of adaptation is that movements are generated based on a learned policy that is adjusted over time by movement errors directly (“direct policy learning”). This learning mechanism could act in parallel with, but independent of, any updates to a predictive forward model. Forward-model-based learning and direct policy learning generate very similar predictions about behavior in conventional adaptation paradigms. However, across three experiments with human participants (N= 47, 26 female), we show that these mechanisms can be dissociated based on the properties of implicit adaptation under mirror-reversed visual feedback. Although mirror reversal is an extreme perturbation, it still elicits implicit adaptation; however, this adaptation acts to amplify rather than to reduce errors. We show that the pattern of this adaptation over time and across targets is consistent with direct policy learning but not forward-model-based learning. Our findings suggest that the forward-model-based theory of adaptation needs to be re-examined and that direct policy learning provides a more plausible explanation of implicit adaptation.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTThe ability of our brain to adapt movements in response to error is one of the most widely studied phenomena in motor learning. Yet, we still do not know the process by which errors eventually result in adaptation. It is known that the brain maintains and updates an internal forward model, which predicts the consequences of motor commands, and the prevailing theory of motor adaptation posits that this updated forward model is responsible for trial-by-trial adaptive changes. Here, we question this view and show instead that adaptation is better explained by a simpler process whereby motor output is directly adjusted by task errors. Our findings cast doubt on long-held beliefs about adaptation. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|