| Popis: |
Quo vadis Eurazjo? : w poszukiwaniu nowych dróg partnerstwa, 2020 The evolution of the Eurasian idea was conditioned by the circumstances of its development. In the interwar period, when the idea of Russia-Eurasia was proposed by a group of emigrés such as N.S. Trubetzkoy and P. Savitsky, the motivating main factor probably boiled down to alienation and the need for compensation. That is why Eurasianism proposed such ideas as imperialism of any ideological color, the concept of an imaginary Eurasian nation, an ideocratic state and strong aversion to the domination of the Western world. Interwar Eurasianism and its later incarnations emphasize the essential role of the Horde in shaping the Russian state, which was also reflected in the theory of ethnogenesis created by L.N. Gumilyov, a Eurasianist of the Soviet period. Post-Soviet neo-Eurasianism focuses on the idea of historical revanchism (A.S. Panarin), geopolitics opposing the democratic and liberal Atlanticism to the Eurasian continental domain of Tradition (A.G. Dugin), the Islamic reference to Eurasia, the Old World, as the primary seat of the Abrahamic religions (G. Dzhemal), as well as the pragmatic Central Asian version of the doctrine emphasizing the need for an economic and social community, based on the principle of equality among Eurasian actors. |
