Symbolic estrangement or symbolic integration of numerals with quantities: Methodological pitfalls and a possible solution
| Autor: | Bert Reynvoet, Delphine Sasanguie, Mila Marinova |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Male
Physiology Computer science lcsh:Medicine Social Sciences Neuropsychological Tests Notation computer.software_genre Task (project management) Presentation Mathematical and Statistical Techniques 0302 clinical medicine Number Theory Medicine and Health Sciences Psychology lcsh:Science media_common Brain Mapping Multidisciplinary Experimental Design 05 social sciences Software Engineering Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Electrophysiology Bioassays and Physiological Analysis Pattern Recognition Visual Brain Electrophysiology Research Design Physical Sciences Pattern recognition (psychology) Engineering and Technology Female The Symbolic Symbolic integration Statistics (Mathematics) Natural language processing Research Article Adult Computer and Information Sciences Matching (statistics) Adolescent Cognitive Neuroscience media_common.quotation_subject Neurophysiology Research and Analysis Methods 050105 experimental psychology Numeral system Young Adult 03 medical and health sciences Reaction Time Humans Adults 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Statistical Methods Transcranial Stimulation Analysis of Variance Software Tools business.industry lcsh:R Electrophysiological Techniques Cognitive Psychology Reproducibility of Results Biology and Life Sciences Reasoning Age Groups People and Places Cognitive Science lcsh:Q Population Groupings Artificial intelligence business computer Mathematics 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Neuroscience |
| Zdroj: | PLoS ONE PLoS ONE, Vol 13, Iss 7, p e0200808 (2018) |
| ISSN: | 1932-6203 |
| DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0200808 |
| Popis: | Previous studies, which examined whether symbolic and non-symbolic quantity representations are processed by two independent systems or by one common system, reached contradicting findings, possibly due to methodological differences. Indeed, some researchers advocate the two systems approach, based on the presence of notation-specific switch cost in conditions where adults have to compare pairs of symbolic and non-symbolic quantities, in combination with the absence of such a cost in conditions containing quantities of the same notation. However, other researchers used matching instructions, and reported a facilitation in the mixed notation conditions, suggesting that the two systems are automatically integrated. In the current study, we conducted three experiments, in which we examined the existence of two separate quantity systems, but we used various experimental manipulations (e.g., task instructions, presentation order) to unravel the previous inconsistent findings. In Experiment 1, we investigated the role of task instructions by presenting participants with pure and mixed notation trials with both comparison and matching tasks. In Experiment 2, we tested the role of blocked and randomized presentation order for the pure and mixed trials. Our data showed that cost for switching between the symbolic and non-symbolic quantities is present, but is prone to a certain methodological drawback: when the differences between the processing times for two sequentially presented stimuli of different notations are not taken into account, this masks the cost for switching between the two systems. To overcome this problem, in Experiment 3 we used an audio-visual paradigm. Overall, our results provide further evidence for the existence of distinct quantity representations, independently of task instructions or presentation order. Additionally, considering this methodological pitfall we argue that the audio-visual paradigm is better suited when investigating the integration between symbolic and non- symbolic quantities. ispartof: PLoS One vol:13 issue:7 ispartof: location:United States status: Published online |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|