Brief Suicide Questionnaire. Inter-rater reliability
| Autor: | Lucía Pérez-Costillas, Jorge Lopez-Castroman, Diego Palao, Marta Quesada, Fuensanta Aroca, Thais Tiana, Jerónimo Saiz Ruiz, Julio A. Guija, Santiago Durán Sindreu, Isabel Parra Uribe, Pilar A. Saiz, Hilario Blasco-Fontecilla, Mercedes Navío Acosta, Rebeca García-Nieto, Angela Ibáñez, José Luis Escobar, Teresa Legido-Gil, Lucas Giner, María Paz García-Portilla, Yolanda de Diego-Otero, Enrique Baca-García, Rafael Fernández García-Andrade, Dolores Saiz-Gonzalez, Dolores Braquehais, Jorge A. Cervilla, Victor Perez Sola, Miguel Angel Jiménez Arriero |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2012 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Psychometrics Suicide attempt business.industry Statistics Poison control Context (language use) General Medicine Suicide prevention Clinical trial Clinical rating scales Suicide Inter-rater reliability Clinical trials Medicine business Psychiatry Inter-rater agreement Reliability (statistics) Clinical psychology |
| Zdroj: | Revista de Psiquiatria y Salud Mental r-IIB SANT PAU. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau instname |
| ISSN: | 2173-5050 1888-9891 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.rpsmen.2012.04.005 |
| Popis: | Introduction: Inter-rater agreement is a crucial aspect in the planning and performance of a clinical trial in which the main assessment tool is the clinical interview. The main objectives of this study are to study the inter-rater agreement of a tool for the assessment of suicidal behavior (Brief Suicide Questionnaire) and to examine whether the inter-examiner agreement when multiple ratings are made on a single subject is an efficient method to assess the reliability of an instrument. Method: In the context of designing a multicenter clinical trial, 32 psychiatrists assessed a videotaped clinical interview of a patient with suicidal behavior. In order to identify those items in which a greater level of discordance existed and detect the examiners whose ratings differed significantly from the average ratings, we used the DOMENIC method (Detecion of Multiple Examiners Not in Consensus). Results: Inter-rater agreement was between poor ( |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect