| Autor: |
Jermy, B. Rabindran, Almohazey, D., Alamoudi, W. A., Palanivel, R. M., AlSudairi, Nora, Dafalla, H., Almofleh, A. A., Alfareed, T. M., Ravinayagam, Vijaya |
| Rok vydání: |
2021 |
| DOI: |
10.6084/m9.figshare.17088127 |
| Popis: |
Additional file 1: Figure S1. X-ray diffraction pattern of CuFe2O4 impregnated on different structured mesoporous materials. Figure S2. Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm of CuFe2O4 impregnated on different structured mesoporous materials (a) CuFe2O4/Q-10 silica, (b) CuFe2O4/SBA-16, (c) CuFe2O4/Hydrophobic silica, (d) CuFe2O4/MesoZSM-5, (e) CuFe2O4/Mesobeta. Figure S3. Pore size distributions of CuFe2O4 impregnated on different structured mesoporous materials (a) CuFe2O4/Q-10 silica, (b) CuFe2O4/SBA-16, (c) CuFe2O4/Hydrophobic silica, (d) CuFe2O4/MesoZSM-5, (e) CuFe2O4/Mesobeta. Figure S4. Vibrating sample magnetometer analysis of (a) CuFe2O4/MCM-41 and (b) CuFe2O4/Mesosilicalite. Table S1. Textural characteristics of 30% CuFe2O4 impregnated on different mesostructured materials. Table S2. Descriptive statistics of curcumin release over different CuFe2O4/structured silica based nanoformulations. Table S3. Curcumin release over different CuFe2O4/structured silica based nanoformulations (One way ANOVA). Table S4. Post hoc tests for mean difference in curcumin release among different CuFe2O4/structured silica based nanoformulations. Table S5. Pearson correlation of curcumin release over different CuFe2O4/structured silica based nanoformulations. Table S6. Statistical analysis of the cell viability assay performed on (A) MCF7, (B) HeLa, (C) HCT116, and (D) HFF cell lines. Analysis of drug treated was performed compared to cell control (without treatment) using 2way ANOVA with Dunnett���s post hoc test. *p |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
