Comprehensive genomic profiling of recurrent endometrial cancer: Implications for selection of systemic therapy

Autor: Annie Y. Liu, Julia A. Elvin, Nabilah Abdelaal, Jianyu Rao, Joshua G. Cohen, Jacquline N. Fahey, Xiaoyan Wang, Tiffany S. Lai, Laura L. Holman, E.N. Prendergast, Kathleen M. Moore, Gottfried E. Konecny, Maira P. Campos
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
0301 basic medicine
Oncology
medicine.medical_treatment
DNA Mutational Analysis
Systemic therapy
Targeted therapy
0302 clinical medicine
Endometrial cancer
80 and over
Comprehensive genomic profiling
Cancer
Aged
80 and over

Obstetrics and Gynecology
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Middle Aged
Serous fluid
Local
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
DNA mismatch repair
Female
Microsatellite Instability
Biotechnology
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Article
Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine
03 medical and health sciences
Internal medicine
Next generation sequencing
medicine
Genetics
Humans
Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Neoplasm Staging
Retrospective Studies
Aged
business.industry
Human Genome
Microsatellite instability
medicine.disease
Endometrial Neoplasms
Clinical trial
030104 developmental biology
Neoplasm Recurrence
Good Health and Well Being
Neoplasm Recurrence
Local

business
Clear cell
Zdroj: Gynecologic oncology, vol 154, iss 3
Popis: Objectives To assess whether comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) in the setting of routine clinical care allows molecular classification of recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) into the four Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) categories: POLE ultramutated, microsatellite instable, copy-number low, and copy-number high and whether this approach can identify genomic alterations (GAs) which inform treatment decisions. Methods Archival tissues from 74 patients diagnosed with recurrent EC were prospectively analyzed using hybrid-capture-based genomic profiling. Tumor mutational burden and microsatellite instability were measured. Clinically relevant GAs (CRGAs) were defined as GAs associated with targeted therapies available on-label or in mechanism-driven clinical trials. Results Using POLE mutational analysis, mismatch repair status, and p53 mutational analysis as surrogate for ‘copy-number’ status CGP segregated all cases into four TCGA molecular subgroups. While recurrent serous ECs were predominantly copy-number high, we found no clear prevalence of a specific molecular subtype in endometrioid, clear cell or undifferentiated tumors. Every tumor sample had at least one GA and 91% (67/74) had at least one CRGA. In this series 32% (24/74) of patients received a matched therapy based on the results of CGP. Objective responses to the matched therapy were seen in 25% (6/24) of patients with an additional 37.5% (9/24) achieving stable disease leading to a clinical benefit rate of 62.5% with a median treatment duration of 14.6 months (range 4.3–69 months). Conclusions CGP allows molecular classification of EC into four TCGA categories and allows identification of potential biomarkers for matched therapy in the setting of routine clinical care.
Databáze: OpenAIRE