Adjunct low-molecular-weight heparin to improve live birth rate after recurrent implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Autor: | Tarek A. Gelbaya, Luciano G. Nardo, Neelam Potdar, Justin C. Konje |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2013 |
Předmět: |
Abortion
Habitual medicine.medical_specialty medicine.drug_class Low molecular weight heparin Cochrane Library Placebo law.invention Randomized controlled trial Pregnancy law Humans Thrombophilia Medicine Embryo Implantation Birth Rate Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic business.industry Obstetrics Anticoagulants Obstetrics and Gynecology Heparin Low-Molecular-Weight Confidence interval Reproductive Medicine Meta-analysis Relative risk Female business Live birth Live Birth |
Zdroj: | Human Reproduction Update. 19:674-684 |
ISSN: | 1460-2369 1355-4786 |
DOI: | 10.1093/humupd/dmt032 |
Popis: | BACKGROUND Poor fertility outcomes in women with recurrent implantation failure (≥ RIF) present significant challenges in assisted reproduction, and various adjuncts, including heparin, are used for potential improvement in pregnancy rates. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) on live birth rates (LBRs) and implantation rates (IRs) in women with RIF and undergoing IVF. METHODS Studies comparing LMWH versus control/placebo in women with RIF were searched for on MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, conference proceedings and databases for registered and ongoing trials (1980-2012). Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.1. The main outcome measure was LBR per woman. RESULTS Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one quasi-randomized trial met the inclusion criteria. One study included women with at least one thrombophilia ( Qublan et al., 2008) and two studies included women with unexplained RIF ( Urman et al., 2009; Berker et al., 2011). Pooled risk ratios in women with ≥ 3 RIF (N = 245) showed a significant improvement in the LBR (risk ratio (RR) = 1.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.10-2.90, P = 0.02) and a reduction in the miscarriage rate (RR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.06-0.78, P = 0.02) with LMWH compared with controls. The IR for ≥ 3 RIF (N = 674) showed a non-significant trend toward improvement (RR = 1.73, 95% CI 0.98-3.03, P = 0.06) with LMWH. However, the beneficial effect of LMWH was not significant when only studies with unexplained RIF were pooled. The summary analysis for the numbers needed to be treated with LMWH showed that approximately eight women would require treatment to achieve one extra live birth. CONCLUSIONS In women with ≥3 RIF, the use of adjunct LMWH significantly improves LBR by 79% compared with the control group; however, this is to be considered with caution, since the overall number of participants in the studies was small. Further evidence from adequately powered multi-centered RCTs is required prior to recommending LMWH for routine clinical use. This review highlights the need for future basic science and clinical research in this important field. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |