Authorship, citations, acknowledgments and visibility in social media: Symbolic capital in the multifaceted reward system of science
Autor: | Nadine Desrochers, Stefanie Haustein, Adèle Paul-Hus, Timothy D. Bowman, Anabel Quan-Haase, Rodrigo Costas, Vincent Larivière, Jen Pecoskie, Andrew Tsou, Philippe Mongeon |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Université de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l'information |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
scholarly communication
social media inventorship Library and Information Sciences 050905 science studies Scholarly communication Scientific capital Reward system symbolic capital citation analysis reward system of science Social media Sociology authorship Dissemination business.industry acknowledgements 05 social sciences Visibility (geometry) General Social Sciences Foundation (evidence) Public relations Symbolic capital altmetrics impact 0509 other social sciences 050904 information & library sciences business |
Zdroj: | Aarhus University |
Popis: | The reward system of science is undergoing significant changes, as traditional indicators compete with initiatives that offer novel means of disseminating and assessing scholarly impact. This article considers a number of aspects of this reward system, including authorship, citations, acknowledgements and the growing use of social media platforms by academics, with an eye towards identifying contemporary issues relating to scholarly communication practices, as understood through the perspectives of Bourdieu’s symbolic capital and Merton’s recognition framework. The article posits that, while scientific capital remains the foundation upon which the reward system of science is built, this system is revealing itself to be more and more multifaceted, extremely complex, and facing increasing tension between its traditional means of evaluation and the potential of new indicators in the digital era. The article presents an extended literature review, as well as recommendations for further consideration and empirical research. A better understanding of the perceptions of academics would be necessary to properly assess the effects of these new indicators on scholarly communication practices and the reward system of science. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |