Microperimetric Biofeedback Training after Successful Inverted Flap Technique for Large Macular Hole
Autor: | Valeria Albano, Giovanni Alessio, Giancarlo Sborgia, Luigi Sborgia, Francesco Boscia, Ermete Giancipoli, Mario R. Romano, Valentina Pastore, Tiziana Tritto, Gianluigi Giuliani, Alfredo Niro, Umberto Lorenzi, Marco Coassin, Rossella Donghia, Alessandra Sborgia |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Fixation stability
biofeedback medicine.medical_specialty Visual acuity genetic structures medicine.medical_treatment large macular hole lcsh:Medicine Biofeedback behavioral disciplines and activities retinal sensitivity Article Closure rate 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Ophthalmology Medicine Macular hole fixation business.industry lcsh:R microperimeter General Medicine medicine.disease eye diseases Macular function Biofeedback training Visual function 030221 ophthalmology & optometry inverted flap technique medicine.symptom business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery |
Zdroj: | Journal of Clinical Medicine Volume 9 Issue 2 Journal of Clinical Medicine, Vol 9, Iss 2, p 556 (2020) |
ISSN: | 2077-0383 |
DOI: | 10.3390/jcm9020556 |
Popis: | Background: Despite the high closure rate of large macular hole (LMH) after surgery, visual recovery is often worse than expected. Microperimetric biofeedback can improve visual function in macular pathologies. We evaluated the efficacy of biofeedback on macular function after successful inverted flap technique for LMH. Methods: In this prospective comparative study, 26 patients after LMH surgical closure were enrolled. The whole sample was equally divided into two groups. In Group 1 (trained), patients underwent a double cycle of microperimetric biofeedback, using structured light stimulus plus acoustic tone in Group 2 (control), patients underwent scheduled visits. We analyzed visual acuity, retinal sensitivity at central 12° (macular sensitivity, MS) and 4° (central macular sensitivity, CMS), and fixation stability over twelve months. Results: Visual acuity improved mainly in the trained group, without any significant differences between the groups (p > 0.05). Only after training did MS significantly improve (p = 0.01). CMS more significantly improved in the trained (p < 0.001) than the control group (p < 0.01) (Group 1 vs. 2, p = 0.004). Only in the trained group did fixation significantly improve (3 months, p &le 0.03 12 months, p &le 0.01). An equality test on matched data confirmed a greater significant improvement of CMS (p &le 0.02) at all follow-up and fixation (p &le 0.02) at last follow-up after training. Conclusion: Microperimetric biofeedback consolidates and increases the improvement of retinal sensitivity and fixation gained after successful inverted flap technique. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |