How to use the ADI-R for classifying autism spectrum disorders?
| Autor: | Herman van Engeland, Jan K. Buitelaar, Janne C. Visser, Daphne J. van Steijn, Vera Dekker, Sanne Kuijper, Rutger Jan van der Gaag, Maretha de Jonge, Iris J. Oosterling, Ruud B. Minderaa, Annelies de Bildt, Nanda Rommelse, Natasja D.J. van Lang, Anoek M. Oerlemans, Sjoerd Sytema |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Interdisciplinary Centre Psychopathology and Emotion regulation (ICPE) |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2013 |
| Předmět: |
Male
ADI-R medicine.medical_specialty Psychometrics Screening test Adolescent Autism Test validity behavioral disciplines and activities ASD Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Validity Intellectual Disability Interview Psychological mental disorders Diagnosis ADOLESCENTS Developmental and Educational Psychology Hum medicine Humans DCN PAC - Perception action and control NCEBP 9 - Mental health Psychiatry Child Netherlands Mental Health [NCEBP 9] Autism Diagnostic Interview Reproducibility of Results DIAGNOSTIC-OBSERVATION-SCHEDULE medicine.disease Classification Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Rutter Child Development Disorders Pervasive Child Preschool Female Psychology ADOS REVISED ALGORITHM Algorithms MENTAL-RETARDATION Clinical psychology |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 2280-94 Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(10), 2280-2294. SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 10, pp. 2280-94 Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(10), 2280-2294 |
| ISSN: | 0162-3257 |
| Popis: | Contains fulltext : 125717.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) The algorithm of the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised provides criteria for autism versus non-autism according to DSM-IV. Criteria for the broader autism spectrum disorders are needed. This study investigated the validity of seven sets of criteria from the literature, in 1,204 Dutch children (aged 3-18 years) with and without mental retardation. The original criteria (Rutter et al. in ADI-R Autism Diagnostic Interview Revised. Manual. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles, 2003) well discriminated ASD from non-ASD in MR. All other criteria (IMGSAC in Am Soc Hum Genet 69:570-581 2001; Sung et al. in Am J Hum Genet 76: 68-81, 2005; Risi et al. in J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 45: 1094-1103, 2006) were sensitive at the cost of specificity, bearing the risk of overinclusiveness. In the group without MR, clinicians should decide whether sensitivity or specificity is aimed for, to choose the appropriate criteria. Including the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule revised algorithms in the classification, the specificity increases, at the cost of sensitivity. This study adds to a more valid judgment on which criteria to use for specific objectives. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|