Individual and Social Temporalities in American Sociology (1940–2000)
Autor: | Catherine Pugeault-Cicchelli, Maurizio Merico, Vincenzo Cicchelli |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Maître de Conférences at the Faculté des Sciences Humaines et Sociales, Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 (UPD5), Research Fellow at the Department of Sociology and Political Science, University of Salerno (UNISA), Università degli Studi di Salerno (UNISA), University of Salerno |
Rok vydání: | 2006 |
Předmět: |
Soziologie
Sociology and Political Science Social issues ddc:070 Sociology & anthropology 060104 history Temporalities age generation life cycle life course 0504 sociology Sociology Scientometrics Bibliometrics Informetrics 0601 history and archaeology News media journalism publishing temporalities Repertoire 05 social sciences Lexical analysis 050401 social sciences methods Szientometrie Bibliometrie Informetrie 06 humanities and the arts Linguistics Epistemology Social force Soziologie Anthropologie Life course approach Publizistische Medien Journalismus Verlagswesen ddc:301 |
Zdroj: | Time & Society Time & Society, Sage, 2006, 15 (1), pp.141-158. ⟨10.1177/0961463X06061335⟩ Time & Society, Sage, 2006, 15 (1), pp.141-158. <10.1177/0961463X06061335> |
Popis: | This article is based on the analysis of 259 titles of articles selected from four American sociological journals (the American Journal of Sociology, Social Forces, the American Sociological Review and Social Problems), over a period of 60 years (1940–2000). These titles contain key words such as age(s), generation(s), life cycle and life course, as well as a group of words that identify the purpose of each specific article. The lexical analysis of the data gathered in this way allows us to observe how various orientations, themes and objects of research are encoded in the titles. Comparing how each of these terms is used shows the way in which sociological reasoning has integrated different perspectives on individual and social temporalities. We have established that each of the four different perspectives considered refers to an exclusive lexical repertoire, to themes of differentiated research that belong to a specific historical period. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |