| Popis: |
Emergency department thoracotomy is often performed on patients in extremis from traumatic exsanguination. Thus, inherent biases may play a role in whether or not the emergency department thoracotomy is performed. We aimed to investigate race, socioeconomic status, and gender disparities in the use of emergency department thoracotomy and to investigate outcomes of these patients to assess for possible surgeon practice bias.A nationwide retrospective cohort analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Programs Participant Use Profile 2016-2018. Adult patients who suffered blunt, penetrating, or other injuries secondary to falls/firearms/motor vehicle collision/other mechanisms of injury and presented to a trauma center pulseless, with or without signs of life after injury. Rates of thoracotomy, time to thoracotomy, transfer to operating room, emergency department disposition, intensive care unit length of stay, hospital length of stay, complications, mortality, and hospital disposition. Univariate analyses and adjusted multivariable regression were performed to account for confounders with significance defined as P.05.A total of 6,453 patients were analyzed. Emergency department thoracotomy and mortality were significantly higher in minorities and uninsured patients, even after risk adjustment. There were no differences in timing among race groups to emergency department thoracotomy. White/Caucasian patients experienced the highest rate of emergency department initial disposition to the intensive care unit (10.3%, P.0001) and lowest mortality rate (89.2%, P.0001).Surgeon bias was not seen in the practice of emergency department thoracotomy for patients arriving pulseless. However, poorer outcomes were associated with minorities and lower socioeconomic status patients. Thoracotomy rates were higher in minorities and lower socioeconomic status patients due to more penetrating trauma. |
Full Text from ScienceDirect