Quality improvement of interdisciplinary rounds by leadership training based on essential quality indicators of the Interdisciplinary Rounds Assessment Scale
| Autor: | Jaap E. Tulleken, Raoul E. Nap, Elsbeth C. M. Ten Have |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Faculteit Medische Wetenschappen/UMCG |
| Rok vydání: | 2013 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male Medical education INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT Quality management Quality Assurance Health Care Patient-centered care Pain medicine media_common.quotation_subject education Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine Nursing Health care Medical Staff Hospital Humans Medicine Quality (business) Staff Development PERSPECTIVE Netherlands Quality Indicators Health Care TEAM media_common Patient Care Team MEDICINE business.industry Communication Videotape Recording Assessment scale Intervention studies Patient Simulation Intensive Care Units Leadership Critical care Workforce Teaching Rounds SKILLS Female business Quality assurance |
| Zdroj: | Intensive Care Medicine, 39(10), 1800-1807. SPRINGER |
| ISSN: | 1432-1238 0342-4642 |
| Popis: | The implementation of interdisciplinary teams in the intensive care unit (ICU) has focused attention on leadership behavior. Daily interdisciplinary rounds (IDRs) in ICUs integrate leadership behavior and interdisciplinary teamwork. The purpose of this intervention study was to measure the effect of leadership training on the quality of IDRs in the ICU.A nonrandomized intervention study was conducted in four ICUs for adults. The intervention was a 1-day training session in a simulation environment and workplace-based feedback sessions. Measurement included 28 videotaped IDRs (total, 297 patient presentations) that were assessed with 10 essential quality indicators of the validated IDR Assessment Scale. Participants were 19 intensivists who previously had no formal training in leading IDRs. They were subdivided by cluster sampling into a control group (ten experienced intensivists) and intervention group (nine intensive care fellows). Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare results between control and intervention groups.Baseline measurements of control and intervention groups revealed two indicators that differed significantly. The frequency of yes ratings for the intervention group significantly increased for seven of the ten indicators from before to after intervention. The frequency of yes ratings after training was significantly greater in the intervention than control groups for eight of the ten essential quality indicators.The leadership training improved the quality of the IDRs performed in the ICUs. This may improve quality and safety of patient care. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink