Associations of Children’s Close Reading Distance and Time Spent Indoors with Myopia, Based on Parental Questionnaire
Autor: | Pärssinen, Olavi, Lassila, Essi, Kauppinen, Markku |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Silmäklinikka, HUS Head and Neck Center |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2022 |
Předmět: |
time spent indoors
ulkoilu esiintyvyys parents’ myopia close reading distance parents opinion CHILDHOOD likinäköisyys kyselytutkimus lapset (ikäryhmät) lukuetäisyys lukeminen AGE nuoret OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES WORLDWIDE 3123 Gynaecology and paediatrics ajankäyttö perinnöllisyys questionnaire study children’s myopia SCHOOLCHILDREN riskitekijät näkö children's myopia PREVALENCE REFRACTIVE ERRORS vanhemmat outdoors Pediatrics Perinatology and Child Health RISK-FACTORS geneettiset tekijät parents' myopia |
Zdroj: | Children; Volume 9; Issue 5; Pages: 632 |
Popis: | Purpose: To study the association of parents’ reports about their children’s near work and outdoor habits with myopia in their children. Methods: Data from a questionnaire study conducted in 1983 among Finnish schoolchildren were reanalyzed. Vision screening had been performed for all the schoolchildren (n = 4961) in the 1st, 5th, and 8th grades (7-, 11-, and 15-year-olds) in an area of Central Finland. The questionnaire, including information about myopia, was returned by 4305 (86.7%) participants. Items concerned parents’ estimates of their child’s habitual reading distance, time spent indoors as compared with age peers, daily near work, outdoors time, and parents’ myopia. The associations of myopia with these factors were studied. Results: Myopia prevalence in those with a habitual close reading distance vs. others was 14.3% vs. 2.1%, 28.7% vs. 13.1% and 45.8% vs. 24.7% for the 7-, 11- and 15-year-olds (p < 0.001 in all age-groups). Myopia prevalence in children reported by their parents as spending more time indoors than age peers was 10.9% vs. 2.8% (p < 0.001), 25.0% vs. 14.7% (p = 0.004) and 41.9% vs. 25.7% (p < 0.001) in the three age groups. Myopia prevalence among those reported as spending both more time indoors and reading at a close distance vs. others was 44.2% vs. 11.9% (Fisher’s exact t-test, p < 0.001). In the multiple logistic regression models, parental myopia almost doubled the risk of myopia in the 11- and 15-year-olds. ORs (95% CI) for myopia adjusted for parental myopia and sex were for close reading distance 7.381 (4.054–13.440), 2.382 (1.666–3.406), 2.237 (1.498–3.057), (p < 0.001), and for more time spent indoors, 3.692 (1.714–7.954), p = 0.001, 1.861 (1.157–2.992), p = 0.010), 1.700 (1.105–2.615), p = 0.016, in the three age groups. Conclusion: Children, especially 7-year-olds, reported by their parents as having a close reading distance and spending a lot of time indoors were associated with a higher risk for myopia. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |