Outcomes after endovascular reintervention for aortic interventions
| Autor: | Michael Williams, Amit S. Kainth, Great participants, Matthew R. Smeds, Tej Sura, Emad Zakhary, Catherine M. Wittgen |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Male
Reoperation medicine.medical_specialty Time Factors Databases Factual medicine.medical_treatment Psychological intervention Femoral artery Endovascular aneurysm repair Risk Assessment symbols.namesake Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation Postoperative Complications Risk Factors medicine.artery Medicine Humans Registries Fisher's exact test Aged Retrospective Studies Aged 80 and over Univariate analysis Aorta business.industry Endovascular Procedures medicine.disease Abdominal aortic aneurysm Surgery Blood Vessel Prosthesis Treatment Outcome Cohort symbols Female Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business Aortic Aneurysm Abdominal |
| Zdroj: | Journal of vascular surgery. 75(3) |
| ISSN: | 1097-6809 |
| Popis: | Endovascular reinterventions are often performed after previous open or endovascular aortic procedures. We used the GREAT (Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment) database to compare the outcomes between these groups. We also compared reintervention of any type with a group of patients who had undergone primary endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).All patients enrolled in GREAT were grouped according to a previous EVAR or open abdominal aortic procedure (OAP). Univariate analysis was performed using the χA total of 3974 subjects who had undergone EVAR with follow-up data available were included in the GREAT. Of the 3974 procedures, 196 (4.9%) were reinterventions (49 after OAP and 147 after previous EVAR). Reintervention after previous EVAR showed a trend toward a greater endoleak rate through 2 years (13.6% vs 4.1%; P = .07), although no difference was found in the occurrence of the intervention (12.2% vs 17.7%; P = .37). Reintervention after OAP resulted in higher all-cause mortality through 2 years of follow-up (32.7% vs 17.7%; P = .0.03). The predictors of mortality included prior OAP, renal insufficiency, and the use of cutdown for access. Compared with the patients who had undergone primary endovascular repair, patients in the reintervention cohort were older (75.3 years vs 73.3 years; P = .0005), had had only femoral artery access used (95.8% vs 90.3%; P .0001), and were more likely to have undergone aortic branch vessel procedures (32.3% vs 13.3%; P .0001). Both all-cause and aorta-related mortality through 2 years was higher in the reintervention group than in the primary EVAR group (21.4% vs 12.5% [P = .0003; and 4.6% vs 1% [P .0001], respectively). On multivariate analysis, the predictors of aortic-related mortality included reintervention, renal insufficiency, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, underweight body mass index, increasing aortic diameter, and the use of brachial artery or other arterial access sites.Endovascular reintervention for aortic pathology was associated with higher mortality than was primary EVAR. Reinterventions after prior OAPs were associated with higher mortality than were prior EVARs. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|