From 'Is' to 'Ought': The Development of Normative Powers of UN Investigative Mechanisms

Autor:	Le Moli, G.
Rok vydání:	2020
Předmět:	Human rights Expression (architecture) Political science media_common.quotation_subject Political Science and International Relations Accountability Actual practice Normative Law Law and economics Terminology media_common
Zdroj:	Chinese Journal of International Law Chinese Journal of International Law, 19(4), 625-681
ISSN:	1746-9937 1540-1650
DOI:	10.1093/chinesejil/jmaa035
Popis:	This article analyses the normative powers conferred on and exercised by 69 Investigative Mechanisms, including UN Commissions of Inquiry, Fact-Finding Missions and Independent Investigative Mechanisms established between 1963 and 2020. Relying on a dataset collected by the author including all their mandates (78) and reports (121), the article introduces an analytical framework and uses it to (i) identify the specific normative powers conferred on Investigative Mechanisms, (ii) the evolution and main step changes in these powers between 1963 and 2020, and (iii) their specific expression in actual practice in matters such as the use of terminology (violations/abuses of human rights by non-State actors), the determination of the standard of proof, the characterization of primary norms, the development of integrated accountability strategies, and the internalization of functions usually entrusted to prosecutorial mechanisms.
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::548f761bc8f72d6cb7c087c7e82e75a2 https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmaa035 Zobrazit plný text záznamu Plný text ve formátu PDF Plný text ve formátu HTML
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje	K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.