Procedural justice and the mental health court judge's role in reducing recidivism
| Autor: | Heathcote W. Wales, Virginia Aldigé Hiday, Bradley Ray |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2010 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male Coercion Procedural justice Pathology and Forensic Medicine Interviews as Topic Criminal Law Humans Justice (ethics) Mental health court Adjudication Recidivism Judicial Role Mental Disorders Criminals Middle Aged Mental health United States Psychiatry and Mental health Accountability Female Crime Psychology Law Social psychology Criminal justice |
| Zdroj: | International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 33:265-271 |
| ISSN: | 0160-2527 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.06.009 |
| Popis: | Based on qualitative observation and quantitative data from eight mental health courts (MHCs), this article argues that observed reductions in recidivism from participation in MHC are caused in part by the role of the judge in conveying elements of procedural justice. Specifically, the judge provides: (1) a heightened level of interpersonal treatment of participants that accords them dignity, respect, and voice; (2) accountability for participants and service providers alike; and (3) transparency for decisions reached through an open negotiation process. Procedural justice theory predicts that participants will thereby be more likely to see legal decisions as legitimate and incorporate the court's values and goals as their own. Preliminary qualitative and quantitative data are presented from interviews of a sample of participants in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia's Mental Health Diversion Court (DCMHDC) that support these hypotheses. DCMHDC participants hold strongly positive views about the procedural justice they receive from their court experience and of the judge's role in providing justice. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect