A Bayesian hierarchical approach to account for left-censored and missing radiation doses prone to classical measurement error when analyzing lung cancer mortality due to γ-ray exposure in the French cohort of uranium miners
Autor: | Estelle Rage, Marion Belloni, Chantal Guihenneuc, Sophie Ancelet |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Laboratoire d'épidémiologie des rayonnements ionisants (LEPID), Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Biostatistique, Traitement et Modélisation des données biologiques, Université de Paris (UP) |
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Lung Neoplasms Neoplasms Radiation-Induced Bayesian inference Bayesian probability Biophysics Radiation Dosage Mining 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging Survival models Measurement errors 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Occupational Exposure Statistics Epidemiology medicine Statistical inference Credible interval Humans Lung cancer General Environmental Science [SDV.EE.SANT]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Ecology environment/Health Flexibility (engineering) [STAT.AP]Statistics [stat]/Applications [stat.AP] Gamma Radiation Radiation Models Statistical business.industry Lung Cancer Hazard ratio Uncertainty Bayes Theorem medicine.disease Gamma Rays 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Cohort Censored data Uranium [SDV.SPEE]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie France business |
Zdroj: | Radiation and Environmental Biophysics Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, Springer Verlag, 2020, 59, pp.423-437. ⟨10.1007/s00411-020-00859-6⟩ |
ISSN: | 1432-2099 0301-634X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00411-020-00859-6⟩ |
Popis: | Epidemiological data on cohorts of occupationally exposed uranium miners are currently used to assess health risks associated with chronic exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation. Nevertheless, exposure uncertainty is ubiquitous and questions the validity of statistical inference in these cohorts. This paper highlights the flexibility and relevance of the Bayesian hierarchical approach to account for both missing and left-censored (i.e. only known to be lower than a fixed detection limit) radiation doses that are prone to measurement error, when estimating radiation-related risks. Up to the authors’ knowledge, this is the first time these three sources of uncertainty are dealt with simultaneously in radiation epidemiology. To illustrate the issue, this paper focuses on the specific problem of accounting for these three sources of uncertainty when estimating the association between occupational exposure to low levels of γ-radiation and lung cancer mortality in the post-55 sub-cohort of French uranium miners. The impact of these three sources of dose uncertainty is of marginal importance when estimating the risk of death by lung cancer among French uranium miners. The corrected excess hazard ratio (EHR) is 0.81 per 100 mSv (95% credible interval: [0.28; 1.75]). Interestingly, even if the 95% credible interval of the corrected EHR is wider than the uncorrected one, a statistically significant positive association remains between γ-ray exposure and the risk of death by lung cancer, after accounting for dose uncertainty. Sensitivity analyses show that the results obtained are robust to different assumptions. Because of its flexible and modular nature, the Bayesian hierarchical models proposed in this work could be easily extended to account for high proportions of missing and left-censored dose values or exposure data, prone to more complex patterns of measurement error. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |