Toward consensus in defining and handling contextual factors within rheumatology trials:an initial qualitative study from an OMERACT Working Group

Autor: Sabrina Mai Nielsen, Josef S Smolen, Marieke Voshaar, Annelies Boonen, Marianne Uggen Rasmussen, Peter Tugwell, Torkell Ellingsen, Lyn March, Reuben Escorpizo, Thasia G. Woodworth, Beverley Shea, Karine Toupin-April, Dorcas E. Beaton, Daniëlle A W M van der Windt, Maarten Boers, Maarten de Wit, Caroline A Flurey, Barnaby C Reeves, Daniel E. Furst, George A. Wells, Robin Christensen
Přispěvatelé: Psychology, Health & Technology, Epidemiology and Data Science, General practice, Ethics, Law & Medical humanities, APH - Methodology, RS: CAPHRI - R3 - Functioning, Participating and Rehabilitation, Interne Geneeskunde, MUMC+: MA Reumatologie (9)
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
Male
Outcome Assessment
CHECKLIST
Applied psychology
GUIDELINES
Terminology
0302 clinical medicine
Outcome Assessment
Health Care

Health care
Formerly Health & Social Sciences
Immunology and Allergy
Medicine
030212 general & internal medicine
Qualitative Research
OUTCOMES
Clinical Trials as Topic
HEALTH EQUITY
Outcome measures
Focus Groups
Middle Aged
health care
Research Personnel
arthritis
Research Design
GUIDELINE
Female
CLINICAL-TRIALS
medicine.medical_specialty
Consensus
Immunology
systematic reviews
PATIENT
General Biochemistry
Genetics and Molecular Biology

03 medical and health sciences
Rheumatology
Rheumatic Diseases
Terminology as Topic
Internal medicine
Qualitative research
Humans
Treatment effect
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
outcome assessment
030203 arthritis & rheumatology
business.industry
Arthritis
CARE
Focus group
Clinical trial
Health Care
patient reported outcome measures
Rheumatologists
business
Zdroj: Nielsen, S M, Rasmussen, M U, Boers, M, van der Windt, D, de Wit, M, Woodworth, T G, Flurey, C A, Beaton, D E, Shea, B, Escorpizo, R, Furst, D E, Smolen, J S, April, K T, Boonen, A, Voshaar, M, Ellingsen, T, Wells, G A, Reeves, B C, March, L, Tugwell, P S & Christensen, R 2020, ' Toward consensus in defining and handling contextual factors within rheumatology trials : an initial qualitative study from an OMERACT Working Group ', Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases . https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217895
Nielsen, S M, Rasmussen, M U, Boers, M, van der Windt, D A, de Wit, M, Woodworth, T G, Flurey, C A, Beaton, D, Shea, B, Escorpizo, R, Furst, D E, Smolen, J S, Toupin-April, K, Boonen, A, Voshaar, M, Ellingsen, T, Wells, G A, Reeves, B C, March, L, Tugwell, P & Christensen, R 2021, ' Towards consensus in defining and handling contextual factors within rheumatology trials : An initial qualitative study from an OMERACT working group ', Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 80, no. 2, 217895, pp. 242-249 . https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217895
Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 80(2), 242-249. BMJ
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 80(2):217895, 242-249. BMJ Publishing Group
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 80(2), 242-249. BMJ Publishing Group
Nielsen, S M, Rasmussen, M U, Boers, M, van der Windt, D A, de Wit, M, Woodworth, T G, Flurey, C A, Beaton, D, Shea, B, Escorpizo, R, Furst, D E, Smolen, J S, Toupin-April, K, Boonen, A, Voshaar, M, Ellingsen, T, Wells, G A, Reeves, B C, March, L, Tugwell, P & Christensen, R 2021, ' Towards consensus in defining and handling contextual factors within rheumatology trials : An initial qualitative study from an OMERACT working group ', Annals of the rheumatic diseases, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 242-249 . https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217895
ISSN: 0003-4967
1468-2060
Popis: ObjectivesThe Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Initiative established the Contextual Factors Working Group to guide the understanding, identification and handling of contextual factors for clinical trials. In clinical research, different uses of the term ‘contextual factors’ exist. This study explores the perspectives of researchers (including clinicians) and patients in defining 'contextual factor’ and its related terminology, identifying such factors and accounting for them in trials across rheumatology.MethodsWe conducted individual semistructured interviews with researchers (including clinicians) who have experience within the field of contextual factors in clinical trials or other potentially relevant areas, and small focus group interviews with patients with rheumatic conditions. We transcribed the interviews and applied qualitative content analysis.ResultsWe interviewed 12 researchers and 7 patients. Researcher's and patient's descriptions of contextual factors were categorised into two broad themes, each comprising two contextual factors types. The ‘treatment effect’ theme focused on factors explaining variations in treatment effects (A) among patients and (B) among studies. The ‘outcome measurement’ theme focused on factors that explain (C) variations in the measurement result itself (apart from actual changes/differences in the outcome) and (D) variations in the outcome itself (beside treatment of interest). Methods for identifying and handling contextual factors differed among these themes and types.ConclusionsTwo main themes for contextual factors with four types of contextual factors were identified based on input from researchers and patients. This will guide operationalisation of contextual factors. Further research should refine our findings and establish consensus among relevant stakeholders.
Databáze: OpenAIRE