New Methods in the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection
| Autor: | Nora Renz, K Yermak, S. Cabric, S Karbysheva, Andrej Trampuz |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Orthopedic surgery
030222 orthopedics medicine.medical_specialty Implant surface business.industry medicine.medical_treatment Aseptic loosening Periprosthetic Prosthetic joint infection Prosthesis Surgery 03 medical and health sciences synovial fluid 0302 clinical medicine novel diagnostic tests diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection Multiplex polymerase chain reaction medicine Synovial fluid In patient 030212 general & internal medicine biofilms business RD701-811 |
| Zdroj: | Travmatologiâ i Ortopediâ Rossii, Vol 25, Iss 4, Pp 56-63 (2019) |
| ISSN: | 2542-0933 2311-2905 |
| DOI: | 10.21823/2311-2905-2019-25-4-56-63 |
| Popis: | A timely and accurate diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is crucial to plan adequate treatment. Purpose of the study. To evaluate the performance of new diagnostic tests for the diagnosis of PJI. Material and Methods. The performance of novel biomarkers in synovial fluid (i.e. D-lactate and alfa-defensin), molecular test (i.e. PCR of synovial fluid and sonication fluid), new methods to dislodge biofilm from implant surface (i.e. MicroDTTect) and sonication of explanted prosthesis were investigated in patients with PJI and aseptic loosening of the prosthesis. Results. D-lactate showed better sensitivity for the diagnosis of PJI compared to leukocyte count (86% and 80%, respectively). The optimal D-lactate cut-off value was calculated at 1.26 mmol/l. The ADLF test showed sensitivity of 84%, 67% and to 54% depending on classification criteria used for the diagnosis of PJI (Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS), The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and proposed European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) criteria, respectively). Using the proposed EBJIS definition criteria, the sensitivity of the leukocyte count was significantly higher than that of the ADLF test (86% compared with 54%; p0,001), particularly in chronic PJI (81% compared with 44%, respectively; p0,001). The sensitivity of synovial fluid PCR was 60% and herewith comparable with synovial fluid culture (52%, p = 0,239). The sensitivity and specificity of sonication fluid culture were 58% and 100%, which was comparable to sonication fluid PCR 51% and 94%, respectively. DTT-based method showed low sensitivity for diagnosis of PJI (40%) compared to sonication (80%, p0,01). Conclusion. Synovial fluid D-lactate demonstrated good analytical performance and diagnostic value for the diagnosis of PJI. In particular, the high sensitivity for diagnosing infection and rapid availability of the test result make synovial fluid D-lactate suitable as screening test, whereas ADLF had limited sensitivity (54%) but high specificity (95%) and it should therefore not be used for screening, but rather as a confirmatory test for PJI. Multiplex PCR of synovial fluid and sonication fluid has similar sensitivity and specificity compared to synovial fluid culture, having the advantage of rapid availability of results (within 5 hours) and fully automated process. With further improvement of its performance and inclusion of additional primers, multiplex PCR may complement conventional cultures, especially for rapid and accurate diagnosis of low-grade PJI. Culture of samples obtained by sonication of prostheses showed better sensitivity for the microbiologic diagnosis of prosthetic hip and knee infection compared to chemical based dislodgement such as MicroDTTect. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|