Cost‐Utility Analysis of Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Different PD-L1 Expression Levels

Autor: Rao Xin, Xiuhua Weng, Meiyue Li, Shen Lin, Lixian Zhong, Shaohong Luo, Xiongwei Xu, Pinfang Huang
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
Male
0301 basic medicine
Oncology
Cancer Research
Cost-Benefit Analysis
medicine.medical_treatment
non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Pembrolizumab
Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1)
B7-H1 Antigen
law.invention
0302 clinical medicine
Randomized controlled trial
law
Carcinoma
Non-Small-Cell Lung

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
Neoplasm Metastasis
health care economics and organizations
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
General Medicine
Middle Aged
Markov Chains
Gene Expression Regulation
Neoplastic

030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Female
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Non small cell
medicine.medical_specialty
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Context (language use)
Antibodies
Monoclonal
Humanized

Disease-Free Survival
Article
03 medical and health sciences
Internal medicine
medicine
Humans
Chemotherapy
Lung cancer
Cost–utility
Aged
Cost–utility analysis
business.industry
medicine.disease
030104 developmental biology
Clinical Trials
Phase III as Topic

business
Zdroj: Oncology Research
ISSN: 0965-0407
Popis: To evaluate the cost‐utility of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy as the first-line setting for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from the US health care system perspective, a Markov model was developed to compare the lifetime cost and effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for untreated metastatic NSCLC, based on the clinical data derived from phase III randomized controlled trial (KEYNOTE-042; ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT02220894). Weibull distribution was fitted to simulate the parametric survival functions. Drug costs were collected from official websites, and utility values were obtained from published literature. Total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were computed as primary output indicators. The impact of different PD-L1 expression levels on ICER was also evaluated. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the model uncertainty. Compared with chemotherapy, patients treated with pembrolizumab provided an additional 1.13, 1.01, and 0.59 QALYs in patients with PD-L1 expression levels of ≥50%, ≥20%, and ≥1%, with corresponding incremental cost of 53,784, 47,479, and 39,827, respectively. The resultant ICERs of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy were 47,596, 47,184, and 68,061/QALY, in three expression levels of PD-L1, respectively, all of which did not exceed the WTP threshold of 180,000/QALY. Probability sensitivity analysis outcome supported that pembrolizumab exhibited evident advantage over chemotherapy to be cost-effective. One-way sensitivity analysis found that ICERs were most sensitive to utility value of pembrolizumab in progression survival state. All the adjustment of parameters did not qualitatively change the result. For treatment-naive, metastatic NSCLC patients with PD-L1+, pembrolizumab was estimated to be cost-effective compared with chemotherapy for all PD-L1 expression levels at a WTP threshold of 180,000/QALY in the context of the US health care system.
Databáze: OpenAIRE