Diversity of methodologies to experiment integrated pest management in arable cropping systems: analysis and reflections based on a European network
Autor: | Martin Lechenet, Adrian C. Newton, Caroline Colnenne-David, Paolo Bàrberi, Vincent Cellier, Jean Marie Nolot, Bo Melander, César Fernández-Quintanilla, Nicolas Munier-Jolain, Silke Dachbrodt-Saaydeh, Clotilde Toque, Roman Kierzek, Michel Bertrand, Patrick Retaureau, Thierry Doré, Juergen Schwarz, Françoise Lescourret, Silvia Panozzo, Pascal Farcy, Philippe Debaeke, Violaine Deytieux, Jay Ram Lamichhane, Vasileios P. Vasileiadis, Marco Mazzoncini, Cathy Hawes, Eric Justes, Per Kudsk, Daniele Antichi, Maurizio Sattin, Raphaël Charles, Lionel Jouy, Jean-Noël Aubertot, Anna Camilla Moonen, Antoine Messéan, Gilles Grandeau |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Agroécologie [Dijon], Université de Bourgogne (UB)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] (UBFC)-AgroSup Dijon - Institut National Supérieur des Sciences Agronomiques, de l'Alimentation et de l'Environnement, Domaine expérimental d'Époisses - UE0115 U2E (DIJ EPOISSES), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), University of Pisa - Università di Pisa, AGroécologie, Innovations, teRritoires (AGIR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées, Scuela Santa Anna (SSSA), Scuola Universitaria Superiore Sant'Anna [Pisa] (SSSUP), Agronomie, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Institute for Plant Production Sciences, Agroscope, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants Institute for Strategies and Technology Assessment, Julius Kühn-Institut - Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants (JKI), Instituto de Ciencias Agrarias-CSIC (ICA-CSIC), The James Hutton Institute, ARVALIS - Institut du Végétal [Boigneville], ARVALIS - Institut du végétal [Paris], Weed Science and Plant Protection Department, Institute of Plant Protection, National Research Institute Władysława Węgorka, Aarhus University [Aarhus], Unité Impacts Ecologiques des Innovations en Production Végétale (ECO-INNOV), Unité de recherche Plantes et Systèmes de Culture Horticoles (PSH), Institute of Agro-Environmental and Forest Biology, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche [Roma] (CNR), OSCAR FP7-KBBE 289277/ CIMAS trial from the LIFEll ENV/IT/000302 IPNOA/ SOLIBAM FP7-KBBE 245058/FP6 Grain Legumes Integrated Project/ Food-CT-2004-506223, European Project: 265865, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université de Bourgogne (UB)-AgroSup Dijon - Institut National Supérieur des Sciences Agronomiques, de l'Alimentation et de l'Environnement-Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] (UBFC), Domaine expérimental d'Époisses (DIJ EPOISSES), Scuela Superiore Sant'Anna di Pisa, AgroParisTech-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Julius Kühn Institute (JKI), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT), National Research Council of Italy | Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR) |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
agroecology
0106 biological sciences Integrated pest management [SDV.SA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences analyse factorielle Computer science systeme de culture expérimentation de terrain Soil Science factor analysis Plant Science cropping system réseau européen 01 natural sciences Consistency (database systems) culture durable Relevance (information retrieval) Cropping system Field experiment Integrated pest management Agroecology SWOT analysis gestion intégrée des ravageurs 2. Zero hunger integrated pest management culture arable SWOT analysis 04 agricultural and veterinary sciences SWOT 15. Life on land Agroécologie Field experiment Systems analysis field experiment Agronomy 13. Climate action Sustainability 040103 agronomy & agriculture integrated disease management 0401 agriculture forestry and fisheries Design process Agroecology Cropping system Agronomy and Crop Science Biological regulation Cropping 010606 plant biology & botany |
Zdroj: | European Journal of Agronomy European Journal of Agronomy, Elsevier, 2017, 83, pp.86-99. ⟨10.1016/j.eja.2016.09.012⟩ European journal of agronomy 83 (2017): 86–99. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2016.09.012 info:cnr-pdr/source/autori:Martin Lecheneta, Violaine Deytieux, Daniele Antichi, Jean-Noël Aubertot,Paolo Bàrberi, Michel Bertrand, Vincent Cellier, Raphaël Charles,Caroline Colnenne-David, Silke Dachbrodt-Saaydeh, Philippe Debaeke, Thierry Doréf,Pascal Farcy, César Fernandez-Quintanilla, Gilles Grandeau, Cathy Hawes,Lionel Jouy, Eric Justes, Roman Kierzek, Per Kudsk, Jay Ram Lamichhane, Francoise Lescourret, Marco Mazzoncini, Bo Melander, Antoine Messéan,Anna-Camilla Moonen, Adrian C. Newton, Jean-Marie Nolot, Silvia Panozzo,Patrick Retaureau, Maurizio Sattin, Juergen Schwarz, Clotilde Toqué,Vasileios P. Vasileiadis, Nicolas Munier-Jolain/titolo:Diversity of methodologies to experiment Integrated PestManagement in arable cropping systems: Analysis and reflections based on a European network/doi:10.1016%2Fj.eja.2016.09.012/rivista:European journal of agronomy/anno:2017/pagina_da:86/pagina_a:99/intervallo_pagine:86–99/volume:83 Lechenet, M, Deytieux, V, Antichi, D, Aubertot, J-N, Barberi, P, Bertrand, M, Cellier, V, Charles, R, Colnenne-David, C, Dachbrodt-Saaydeh, S, Debaeke, P, Doré, T, Farcy, P, Fernandez-Quintanilla, C, Grandeau, G, Hawes, C, Jouy, L, Justes, E, Kierzek, R, Kudsk, P, Lamichhane, J R, Lescourret, F, Mazzoncini, M, Melander, B, Messéan, A, Moonen, A-C, Newton, A C, Nolot, J-M, Panozzo, S, Retaureau, P, Sattin, M, Schwarz, J, Toqué, C, Vasileiadis, V P & Munier-Jolain, N 2017, ' Diversity of methodologies to experiment Integrated Pest Management in arable cropping systems: Analysis and reflections based on a European network ', European Journal of Agronomy, vol. 83, pp. 86-99 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2016.09.012 European Journal of Agronomy, 2017, 83, pp.86-99. ⟨10.1016/j.eja.2016.09.012⟩ |
ISSN: | 1161-0301 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.eja.2016.09.012⟩ |
Popis: | Integrated Pest Management (IPM) aims to promote physical and biological regulation strategies that help farmers contain populations of pests (pathogens, animal pests and weeds) and to finally reduce the reliance on pesticides. It is based on the holistic combination of multiple management measures rather than on the sum of single methods, each of them having only small effects on pests reduction. Thus, to analyse the interactions between IPM measures and to evaluate the sustainability of their implementation, we require an approach considering the whole cropping system (CS), i.e. a functional entity whose complexity is more than the sum of its parts. A network of European experiments at the CS level was set up recently, and aimed at sharing data and expertise to enhance knowledge of IPM. Comparison of existing methodologies highlighted a diversity of CS designs and experimental layouts. We deduced that the concept of CS itself was viewed differently among scientists, and this affected experimental protocols. Other differences were related to the research context and objectives. Some experiments aimed to explore very innovative strategies and generated knowledge on both their effects on the agroecosystem and their ability to satisfy a set of performance targets, while others aimed to provide quickly adoptable solutions for local farmers in line with the current socio-economic constraints. In some research programmes, the experiment was part of the CS design process — and tested CS were regularly revised based on an continuous improvement loop — while in other cases CS were kept stable across years so as to enable the evaluation of their long-term cumulative effects. A critical aspect contributing to the diversity among CS experiments was the distinction between a factorial design of experimental CS and systemic approaches: factorial experiments allowed quantification of the effects of each IPM component regardless of the consistency between components defining the CS. In contrast, systemic approaches focused on the overall evaluation of CS designed with consideration of their consistency, hence maximising their ability to meet the objectives. Because CS experiments represent a huge investment in terms of economics and time, preliminary reflections of the relevance of the experimental strategy is of critical importance. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |