Suitability of Secondary PEEK Telescopic Crowns on Zirconia Primary Crowns: The Influence of Fabrication Method and Taper

Autor: Christina Wagner, Veronika Stock, Patrick R. Schmidlin, Malgorzata Roos, Marlis Eichberger, Bogna Stawarczyk, Susanne Merk
Přispěvatelé: University of Zurich, Stawarczyk, Bogna
Rok vydání: 2016
Předmět:
Fabrication
Materials science
polyetheretherketone (PEEK)
zirconia
telescopic crowns
computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM)
retention load (RL)
610 Medicine & health
02 engineering and technology
lcsh:Technology
Article
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Fabrication methods
10066 Clinic of Conservative and Preventive Dentistry
Peek
General Materials Science
Cubic zirconia
Composite material
lcsh:Microscopy
lcsh:QC120-168.85
lcsh:QH201-278.5
lcsh:T
030206 dentistry
10060 Epidemiology
Biostatistics and Prevention Institute (EBPI)

021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology
2500 General Materials Science
lcsh:TA1-2040
lcsh:Descriptive and experimental mechanics
lcsh:Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering
0210 nano-technology
lcsh:Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
lcsh:TK1-9971
Zdroj: Materials
Materials, Vol 9, Iss 11, p 908 (2016)
Materials; Volume 9; Issue 11; Pages: 908
DOI: 10.5167/uzh-130157
Popis: This study investigates the retention load (RL) between ZrO2 primary crowns and secondary polyetheretherketone (PEEK) crowns made by different fabrication methods with three different tapers. Standardized primary ZrO2 crowns were fabricated with three different tapers: 0°, 1°, and 2° (n = 10/group). Ten secondary crowns were fabricated (i) milled from breCam BioHPP blanks (PM); (ii) pressed from industrially fabricated PEEK pellets (PP) (BioHPP Pellet); or (iii) pressed from granular PEEK (PG) (BioHPP Granulat). One calibrated operator adjusted all crowns. In total, the RL of 90 secondary crowns were measured in pull-off tests at 50 mm/min, and each specimen was tested 20 times. Two- and one-way ANOVAs followed by a Scheffé’s post-hoc test were used for data analysis (p < 0.05). Within crowns with a 0° taper, the PP group showed significantly higher retention load values compared with the other groups. Among the 1° taper, the PM group presented significantly lower retention loads than the PP group. However, the pressing type had no impact on the results. Within the 2° taper, the fabrication method had no influence on the RL. Within the PM group, the 2° taper showed significantly higher retention load compared with the 1° taper. The taper with 0° was in the same range value as the 1° and 2° tapers. No impact of the taper on the retention value was observed between the PP groups. Within the PG groups, the 0° taper presented significantly lower RL than the 1° taper, whereas the 2° taper showed no differences. The fabrication method of the secondary PEEK crowns and taper angles showed no consistent effect within all tested groups.
Databáze: OpenAIRE