Joint work and power for both the forelimb and hindlimb during trotting in the horse
| Autor: | Edward A. Cogger, Hilary M. Clayton, Steven J. Wickler, Darren Dutto, Donald F. Hoyt |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2006 |
| Předmět: |
musculoskeletal diseases
animal structures Physiology Elbow STRIDE Hindlimb Kinematics Aquatic Science Models Biological Running Inverse dynamics Forelimb medicine Animals Thorax (insect anatomy) Horses Molecular Biology Ecology Evolution Behavior and Systematics Mathematics Work (physics) Anatomy Elasticity Biomechanical Phenomena body regions medicine.anatomical_structure Insect Science Joints Animal Science and Zoology Energy Metabolism |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Experimental Biology. 209:3990-3999 |
| ISSN: | 1477-9145 0022-0949 |
| Popis: | SUMMARY The net work of the limbs during constant speed over level ground should be zero. However, the partitioning of negative and positive work between the fore- and hindlimbs of a quadruped is not likely to be equal because the forelimb produces a net braking force while the hindlimb produces a net propulsive force. It was hypothesized that the forelimb would do net negative work while the hindlimb did net positive work during trotting in the horse. Because vertical and horizontal impulses remain unchanged across speeds it was hypothesized that net work of both limbs would be independent of speed. Additionally because the major mass of limb musculature is located proximally,it was hypothesized that proximal joints would do more work than distal joints. Kinetic and kinematic analysis were combined using inverse dynamics to calculate work and power for each joint of horses trotting at between 2.5 and 5.0 m s–1. Work done by the hindlimb was indeed positive (consistently 0.34 J kg–1 across all speeds), but, contrary to our hypothesis, net work by the forelimb was essentially zero (but also independent of trotting speed). The zero net work of the forelimb may be the consequence of our not being able to account, experimentally, for the negative work done by the extrinsic muscles connecting the scapula and the thorax. The distal three joints of both limbs behaved elastically with a period of energy absorption followed by energy return. Proximal forelimb joints (elbow and shoulder) did no net work, because there was very little movement of the elbow and shoulder during the portion of stance when an extensor moment was greatest. Of the two proximal hindlimb joints, the hip did positive work during the stride,generating energy almost throughout stance. The knee did some work, but like the forelimb proximal joints, had little movement during the middle of stance when the flexion moment was the greatest, probably serving to allow the efficient transmission of energy from the hip musculature to the ground. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|