Medical malpractice litigation after total shoulder arthroplasty: a comprehensive analysis based on the Westlaw legal database

Autor: Martinus Megalla, Nareena Imam, Lainey Bukowiec, Daniel Coban, Martin Malik, Zachary T. Grace, Eitan M. Kohan, Frank G. Alberta
Rok vydání: 2023
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 32:539-545
ISSN: 1058-2746
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.09.010
Popis: Orthopedic surgery is one of the most common subspecialties subject to medical malpractice claims. Although Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA) is associated with favorable patient outcomes and relatively low complication rates, surgeons performing this procedure may be subject to malpractice litigation leading to significant economic and psychological burden on the provider. The purpose of this study is to characterize and describe malpractice claims against orthopedic surgeons performing TSA utilizing the Westlaw legal database.The Westlaw Legal Database was queried for all cases related to TSA using the terms "malpractice" AND "shoulder replacement" OR "shoulder arthroplasty." Cases were excluded if the defendant was not an orthopedic surgeon, the procedure involved was not a TSA, or if the patient was a minor. Patient demographics, causes cited for litigation, case outcomes, and indemnity payments were analyzed to determine common factors that lead plaintiffs to pursue legal action.Thirty-five TSA cases were identified that met inclusion criteria. The mean plaintiff age was 55 years with 63.6% female. The most common category of negligence alleged was intraoperative error, which occurred in twenty-five claims (71%). The most common types of damages incurred were nerve injury (23%), functional limitation (20%), and infection (17%). Overall, twenty-seven cases (77%) resulted in a defense verdict. Four cases (11%) resulted in settlements and four cases (11%) resulted in plaintiff verdicts. The average inflation-adjusted monetary award in these cases was $1,619,919 (SD, $1,689,452).This study provides a comprehensive summary of malpractice claims and associated outcomes in TSA. Given the rapidly increasing rate of TSA in the United States and the burden of associated malpractice claims, understanding potential legal implications of TSA is of great value to orthopedic surgeons. Intraoperative error was the category of negligence cited most commonly in TSA malpractice claims. Nerve injury, functional limitation, and infection were the most commonly cited specific damages. These findings highlight the need for orthopedic surgeons to educate patients regarding potential postoperative complications while continuing to focus on minimizing their occurrence.
Databáze: OpenAIRE