Understanding Quality in Research: Avoiding Predatory Journals
| Autor: | Genae Strong |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Quality Control
Value (ethics) business.industry Process (engineering) media_common.quotation_subject Obstetrics and Gynecology Quality control Scientific literature Public relations Business model 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Publishing Humans Lactation Female Quality (business) 030212 general & internal medicine Periodicals as Topic business GeneralLiterature_REFERENCE(e.g. dictionaries encyclopedias glossaries) Breast feeding 030217 neurology & neurosurgery media_common |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Human Lactation. 35:661-664 |
| ISSN: | 1552-5732 0890-3344 |
| DOI: | 10.1177/0890334419869912 |
| Popis: | Peer-review publishing has long been the gold standard for disseminating research. The peer-review process holds researchers accountable for their work and conveys confidence that the article is of value to the reader. Predatory journals and publishing pose a global threat to the quality of scientific literature, accuracy of educational resources, and safety of patient care. Predatory publishing uses an exploitative business model, substandard quality control measures, and deceptive publishing practices. Given the proliferation of these journals and the extreme measures utilized to disguise substandard publishing practices, avoiding them can prove difficult. Understanding the nature of predatory publishing and how to recognize the warning signs provide helpful measures to authors, researchers, students, and readers. Additional resources known to help avoid predatory publishers have been discussed in addition to reviewing the Journal of Human Lactation guidelines for publishing. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|