FAST2: An intelligent assistant for finding relevant papers
Autor: | Tim Menzies, Zhe Yu |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
FOS: Computer and information sciences
0209 industrial biotechnology Information retrieval D.2.0 Computer science I.2.7 Human error General Engineering 02 engineering and technology Computer Science Applications Software Engineering (cs.SE) Computer Science - Software Engineering 020901 industrial engineering & automation Systematic review Artificial Intelligence 68N01 68T50 0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering Key (cryptography) Selection (linguistics) Domain knowledge 020201 artificial intelligence & image processing Review process |
Zdroj: | Expert Systems with Applications. 120:57-71 |
ISSN: | 0957-4174 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.11.021 |
Popis: | Literature reviews are essential for any researcher trying to keep up to date with the burgeoning software engineering literature. FAST$^2$ is a novel tool for reducing the effort required for conducting literature reviews by assisting the researchers to find the next promising paper to read (among a set of unread papers). This paper describes FAST$^2$ and tests it on four large software engineering literature reviews conducted by Wahono (2015), Hall (2012), Radjenovi\'c (2013) and Kitchenham (2017). We find that FAST$^2$ is a faster and robust tool to assist researcher finding relevant SE papers which can compensate for the errors made by humans during the review process. The effectiveness of FAST$^2$ can be attributed to three key innovations: (1) a novel way of applying external domain knowledge (a simple two or three keyword search) to guide the initial selection of papers---which helps to find relevant research papers faster with less variances; (2) an estimator of the number of remaining relevant papers yet to be found---which in practical settings can be used to decide if the reviewing process needs to be terminated; (3) a novel self-correcting classification algorithm---automatically corrects itself, in cases where the researcher wrongly classifies a paper. Comment: 20+3 pages, 6 figures, 5 tables, and 4 algorithms. Accepted by Journal of Expert Systems with Applications |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |