The methodologies, geographies, and technologies of energy justice: a systematic and comprehensive review
Autor: | Niek Mouter, Kirsten Jenkins, Darren McCauley, Benjamin K. Sovacool, Nicholas Hacking, Mary Kate Burns |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Public Administration |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Research impact
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences Scope (project management) Renewable Energy Sustainability and the Environment Public Health Environmental and Occupational Health 010501 environmental sciences 01 natural sciences Popularity Energy policy Injustice Energy ethics SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being Conceptual framework Political science Energy justice Agency (sociology) Systematic review Normative Engineering ethics SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy Justice (ethics) 0105 earth and related environmental sciences General Environmental Science |
Zdroj: | Jenkins, K E H, Sovacool, B K, Mouter, N, Hacking, N, Burns, M K & McCauley, D 2021, ' The methodologies, geographies, and technologies of energy justice : A systematic and comprehensive review ', Environmental Research Letters, vol. 16, no. 4, 043009 . https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd78c Environmental Research Letters, 16(4):043009. IOP Publishing Ltd. Jenkins, K, Sovacool, B K, Mouter, N, Hacking, N, Burns, M-K & McCauley, D 2021, ' The methodologies, geographies, and technologies of energy justice : A systematic and comprehensive review ', Environmental Research Letters, vol. 16, no. 4, 043009, pp. 1-25 . https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd78c |
ISSN: | 1748-9326 |
DOI: | 10.1088/1748-9326/abd78c |
Popis: | The energy justice literature has seen a rapid surge in both academic and practical popularity. However, there has been less systematic reflection on the research conducted so far, its scope or contribution, nor what it might mean for the future of the concept. To provide insights, this paper presents the results of a systematic and comprehensive review of 155 peer-reviewed articles published across eight databases between January 2008 and December 2019. The aim is firstly to review the current state of the art in the energy justice literature and, secondly, to present findings that support novel recommendations with the potential to enhance the impact of energy justice research, including applications in the economic and planning policy sectors. Critically, our study demonstrates that the literature lacks diversity in its author basis and research design. By contrast, conceptual frameworks and the geographies and technologies of global energy injustice are proliferating. These results illustrate that energy justice has power and agency as a tool. It can act as a protagonist in energy research, provoking researchers to remain reflexively normative and active in identifying injustices and vulnerabilities, and it can act as a promising progenitor, creating new research methods and themes. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |