Prevalence of suicidal ideation, suicide attempt, and suicide plan among HIV/AIDS: A systematic review and meta-analysis
| Autor: | Xin-Man Dou, Yi-xuan Pei, Xing-Lei Wang, Qi Xie, Ju-Hong Pei, Ye-hui Du, Tong Ma, Juan-ping Zhong, Li-xin Yan, Li-Hong Zhang |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Male
Population HIV Infections Suicide Attempted CINAHL Suicidal Ideation 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) Odds Ratio Prevalence Humans Medicine education Suicidal ideation education.field_of_study Suicide attempt business.industry medicine.disease Confidence interval 030227 psychiatry Psychiatry and Mental health Clinical Psychology Relative risk Meta-analysis Female medicine.symptom business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Demography |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Affective Disorders. 292:295-304 |
| ISSN: | 0165-0327 |
| Popis: | Background Suicidality is common in people living with HIV/AIDS. However, the prevalence estimates of the suicidality vary between studies. Here, we performed a systematic review and estimated the prevalence of suicidal behavior in this population. Methods Systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, Scopus and PsycINFO for relevant studies published before August 29, 2020. A random-effects model was used to pool the estimates of the prevalence of suicidal ideation, attempts and plans, which were also stratified by continent or region and screening instrument from the studies included in this meta-analysis. Results Suicide prevalence data were extracted from 36 studies(n=32,818) from 15 countries. The overall pooled crude prevalence estimates of suicidal ideation, plans, and attempts were 20.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 16.5-21.6%],8.1% (95% CI 5.4-11.3%), and 7.5% (95% CI 5.7-9.5%), respectively. For lifetime suicidal ideation and attempts prevalence, this was 22.4% (95% CI 15.9-29.8%), and 12.0% (95% CI 6.9- 18.1%), respectively. Summary prevalence estimates ranged across assessment modalities from 6.5% to 33.7%. Pooled estimates were generally higher for females, as compared with males (risk ratios in the range 1.48-1.85). The leave-one-out analysis showed that no single study significantly affected the final pooled results. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect